Cases

628 F.3d 1169 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Raymundo CONTRERAS-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-50009. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted February 4, 2010.[*] Filed January 3, 2011. *1170 Candis L. Mitchell, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 628 F.3d 1169.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

277 F.Supp.2d 952 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Gabriel CONTRERAS-HERNANDEZ, Defendant. No. 03-CR-36. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. August 7, 2003. *953 Gregory Haanstad, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey De La Rosa, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM ADELMAN, Dist

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F. 3d 704 (second and fourth judgments) and 705 (first and third judgments).

MEMORANDUM ** David Contreras-Hernandez appeals his conviction and 87-month sentence after his guilty plea for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. (1) Contreras contends that his guilty plea must be set aside because the district court did not fulfill the requirement to “add

AFFIRMED; Opinion issued January 31, 2013. In The uiirt rtf ppia1 FiftI! iitrict nf cxa at 1La11a No, 05-12-00737-CR EX PARTE RENE CONTRERAS IIERNANDEZ On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10

ORDER The opinion and partial dissent filed December 20, 2016, arid' appearing at 844 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2016), are withdrawn. The opinion may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. A concurrently issued amended memorandum disposition ' addresses all of the issues before the court. Pursuant to the court’s May 31, 2017 order (No.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-50051 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-05-00578- JFW-7 MANUEL YEPIZ, AKA Martin Sanchez, Seal G and Pony; Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-50062 Plainti

PER CURIAM: Lucindo Nunez appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (T.F. Gilroy Daly, Judge). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. ■ BACKGROUND On April 17, 1991, Nunez, Manuel Ramon Hernandez, Jose Manuel Guerrero, and Jorge L. Co

PER CURIAM: The government moves to dismiss these interlocutory criminal appeals for lack of jurisdiction based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1494, 103 L.Ed.2d 879 (1989). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeals. I. BACKGROUND On February 10, 198

793 F.Supp.2d 525 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Carlos APONTE-SOBRADO, Defendant. Criminal No. 09-228 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 21, 2011. *526 Laura Maldonado-Rodriguez, Laura Maldonado Law Office, John R. Martin, Martin Brother PC, Christopher Adams, Atlanta, GA, Hector A. Deliz,

*1136C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 378 F. 3d 754; C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 385 F. 3d 288; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 384 F. 3d 252; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 241; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 364 F. 3d 1300; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 263; C. A. 11

*1180C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 100 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 247; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 436; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 805; *1181No. 04-7844. No

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A: 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 591); (95 Fed. Appx. 572); (95 Fed. Appx. 677); (95 Fed. Appx. 686); (95 Fed. Appx. 694); (95 Fed. Appx. 576); (95 Fed. Appx. 691); (95 Fed. Appx. 668); (95 Fed. Appx. 693); (95 Fed. Appx. 567); (95 Fed. Appx. 672); (95 Fed. Appx. 616);

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 417 (fifth judgment); 72 Fed. Appx. 193 (first judgment), 212 (third judgment), 224 (ninth judgment), 228 (eighth judgment), 974 (sixth judgment), 985 (seventh judgment), and 993 (fourth judgment); 73 Fed. Appx. 689 (second judgment).

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.