Cases

350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position

C. A. 5th Cir. ' Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 3 Fed. Appx. 656 (seventh judgment); 10 Fed. Appx. 593 (eighth judgment).

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 1 Pages 419–460 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 26, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-2994 & 23-1461 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER ALLEN YATES and SHAWN THOMAS CONNELLY, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-2994 & 23-1461 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER ALLEN YATES and SHAWN THOMAS CONNELLY, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 16-2089 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JEFFRI DÁVILA-REYES, Defendant, Appellant. No. 16-2143 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ D. REYES-VALDIVIA,

KEARSE, Circuit Judge: The United States appeals from an order and second amended judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Edward R. Kor-man, Judge, reducing by 120 months the 482-month term of imprisonment imposed on defendant Gregory Scarpa Jr. (“Scar-pa”) in an amended judgment in 1999 following his conviction of racketeering and other offenses. The district court ordered t

16-303 USA v. Scarpa 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ------ 4 August Term, 2016 5 (Argued: January 17, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017) 6 Docket No. 16-303 7 _____________________________________

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge Douglas Aviles has moved to suppress evidence from a search conducted pursuant to a probation condition that authorized law enforcement officers to search his residence without suspicion. Because the search condition was valid, and because the search was not otherwise unreasonable, the motion to suppress is denied.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE AS FRUIT OF AN ILLEGAL SEARCH JEFFREY T. MILLER, United States District Judge This case presents the question whether the recent Supreme Court case of Riley v. California, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014), generally requiring law enforcement to obtain a search warrant before accessing contents of a cell phone taken from an arrestee, app

St. Eve, Circuit Judge. *259 Two armed men robbed three cash-and-check stores in the Indianapolis area. The heists were not especially sophisticated, but they went viral over the robbers' 1970s-themed disguises. That attention drew an anonymous tip, which led law enforcement to Duprece Jet

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-2051, 17-2052, and 17-2060 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DUPRECE JETT, EARL WALKER, and DAMION MCKISSICK, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from t

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-2051, 17-2052, and 17-2060 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DUPRECE JETT, EARL WALKER, and DAMION MCKISSICK, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Chhay Lim conditionally pleaded guilty of possession of a firearm by an illegal alien. He appeals pre-plea rulings denying his motions to dismiss the indictment, to admit evidence relevant to his immigration status, and to suppress evidence. We affirm the refusal to dismiss the indictment and admit the evidence. We affirm in part and reverse in part the de

ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. This is a civil forfeiture action arising from two successive traffic stops that occurred on a. stretch of Interstate 80 (“I-80”) between Wells, Nevada, and Elko, Nevada.- On February 18, 2014, Plaintiff the United States of America, (“United States”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 11), which the Court denied on July 23, 2014 (Doc.. # 28). B

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is the United States’ motion to disqualify defendant Angel Torres Moreno’s attorney because of an alleged conflict of interest. (Docket No. 1744.) The government’s motion includes a request for a hearing on the conflict-of-interest issue. Id. at ¶ 7. For the reasons that follow, the government’s motion and its accompanying hearing requ

KURT D. ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judge: Felipe Vinagre-Hernandez appeals his guilty verdict and sentence for aiding and abetting the possession of marijuana in the amount of more than 100 kilograms but less than 1,000 kilograms, with intent to distribute. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the application of the Speedy Trial Act. I.