Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Henley”
United States v. Henleypublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants Dominic Henley, James C. Smith, Jerry Elkins, Marshall Fry, Anthony Robinson, and Jerry Peteet were charged with racketeering conspiracy, and various counts of violent crime in aid of racketeering in connection with their involvement with the Wheels of Soul, an outlaw motorcycle gang. Each man pled not guilty. As the case proceeded to trial, a number of the defendants filed motions to suppre
United States v. Henleypublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Troy Henley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certific
United States v. Henleypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 United States v. Henley No. 02-6011 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0070P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0070p.06 ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Martin J. Levitt,
United States v. Henleypublic domain
MEMORANDUM1 Rex Henley, Rafael Bustamante, Willie McGowan, and Garey West (“Appellants”) appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess and distribute twelve kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). In this memorandum disposition, we deny their appeals, except with respect to their new trial motions,
United States v. Henleypublic domain
U.S. v. Henley UNITED STATES, Appellee v. David R. HENLEY, Sr., Captain U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 99-0094 Crim. App. No. 32551 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued October 20, 1999 Decided August 31, 2000 COX, S.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CRAWFORD, C.J., and GIERKE and SULLIVAN, JJ., joined. EFFRON, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and in
United States v. Henleypublic domain
170 F.3d 186 U.S.v.Henley* NO. 97-2113 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. January 28, 1999 1 Appeal From: N.D.Fla. ,No.96-00057-3-CR-4-RV 2</
United States v. Henleypublic domain
8 F.Supp.2d 503 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. David Troy HENLEY, Respondent. No. 5:97-HC-970-H2. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. June 3, 1998. Michael D. Bredenberg, Spec., Asst. U.S. Atty, Raleigh, NC, for U.S. G. Alan DuBois, Raleigh, NC, for Respondent. ORDER MALCOLM J. H
United States v. Henleypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SNYDER, Senior Judge: We hold in this ease as follows: 1) a magistrate, or authorizing official, may, when presented an adequate supporting basis, consider opinion evidence when determining whether probable cause to search exists; 2) when evidence of other crimes or acts is admitted at trial under both Mil.R.Evid. (Rule) 404(b) and 414, a determination at the appellate level that the
United States v. Henleypublic domain
50 F.3d 1032 U.S.v.Henley NO. 94-50138 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 07, 1995 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. A-93-CR-98-(01) 2 AFFIRMED.
Henley v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
United States v. Dwight Henleypublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 18-1428 ___________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DWIGHT D. HENLEY, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 2-15-cr-00199-001) District Judge: Honorable Mark R.
Henley v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
United States v. Henleypublic domain
738 F.2d 425 U.S.v.Henley 83-5911 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. 6/8/84 W.D.Pa., Diamond, J. AFFIRMED
United States v. Dominic Henleypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-1894 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dominic Henley, also known as Bishop lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 13-1935 ___________________________ United States of America llllllllllll
Henley v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 370.
Henley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Henleypublic domain
DECISION POWELL, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted by special court-martial with members of wrongful transfer of phencyclidine (PCP) and assault upon a security policeman who was in the performance of his duty, violations of Articles 92 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 928. The approved sentence includes a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for s
Henley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Henley v. United Statespublic domain
543 U.S. 1078 HENLEYv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-7500. Supreme Court of United States. January 10, 2005. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 108 Fed. Appx. 98.
Henley v. United Statespublic domain
544 U.S. 955 HENLEYv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-8868. Supreme Court of United States. March 28, 2005. 1 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 112 Fed. Appx. 726.