⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Henckel”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970-09-23 · Published · cited 75× · 431 F.2d 1299; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7238; 2 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1009; 2 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,308
WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, Gilbert Moreno, brings this action under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, now codified as 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1 for injunctive relief, a declaratory judgment, and damages arising from deprivation of his First and Fourteenth Amendment right
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001-09-07 · Published · cited 71× · 265 F.3d 576; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19791; 2001 WL 1028298
KANNE, Circuit Judge. Antonio Alanis, defendant-appellant, was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, one count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana, and two counts of being a felon in possession. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 468 months, to be followed by five years of supervised re
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 00-3073 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Alanis, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. No. 3:00CR0008--Robert L. Miller, Jr., Judge. Argued February 13, 2001--Decided September 7, 2001 Before Manion, Kanne, and Evans, Circuit Judges. Kanne, Circuit Judge. Antonio Alanis, defendant-appellant, was convicted
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972-07-05 · Published · cited 0× · 461 F.2d 847
461 F.2d 847 *Incorporation Committee of City of Hills & Dales, Texasv.Henckel 72-1652 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit July 5, 1972 1 W.D.Tex. 2 ---------------
Fayette County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1941-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 40 Pa. D. & C. 337; 1941 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 154
Dumbauld, P. J., — We are called upon to decide in this appeal from a summary conviction a question of much interest and considerable importance to the landowners and sport lovers of the Commonwealth. The question may be briefly stated: May the owner or lessee of a tract of land in this Commonwealth hunt thereon during the legal hunting season, without procuring the license provided for in
United States Customs Court · 1969-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 62 Cust. Ct. 91; 295 F. Supp. 269; 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3658
Rao, Chief Judge: The merchandise involved in this case consists of knives having folding blades which were entered at the port of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and assessed with duty at 17.5 cents each and 27.5 per centum ad valorem under item 649.87, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as pruning knives. It is 'claimed that they are properly dutiable at 50 per centum ad valorem under item 649.75 under the provision for penknives,
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977-10-14 · Published · cited 8× · 565 F.2d 754; 184 U.S. App. D.C. 179; 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11188
Opinion for the court filed by J. SRELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge. J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge. On December 19, 1974 the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), acting pursuant to his authority under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, determined that Roch
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961-07-25 · Published · cited 1× · 293 F.2d 618; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3833
LEONARD P. MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, a native-born citizen of the United States, brought this action against the Attorney General 1 ***as successor to the Alien Property Custodian 2 to recover the sum of $41
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-10-12 · Published · cited 0× · 196 N.Y.S.3d 72; 220 A.D.3d 484; 2023 NY Slip Op 05190
Lucas v Verizon Communications, Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 05190) Lucas v Verizon Communications, Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 05190 Decided on October 12, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-04-07 · Published · cited 7× · 148 N.Y.S.3d 124; 193 A.D.3d 723; 2021 NY Slip Op 02150
Matter of 144-80 Realty Assoc. v 144-80 Sanford Apt. Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 02150) Matter of 144-80 Realty Assoc. v 144-80 Sanford Apt. Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 02150 Decided on April 7, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018-08-30 · Published · cited 1× · 192 A.3d 886; 238 Md. App. 486
Panel: Leahy, Reed, Shaw Geter, JJ. Leahy, J. *488 *888 A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County found that Mr. Michael Quinlan ("Appellee") suffered an occupational
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-05-15 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 3750
Aponte v Estate of Rene Aponte (2019 NY Slip Op 03750) Aponte v Estate of Rene Aponte 2019 NY Slip Op 03750 Decided on May 15, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2022-10-13 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed October 13, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00145-CV SUZANNE S. MUNDY, Appellant V. ENE, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial
Swartz v. Swartzpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-12-14 · Published · cited 50× · 2016 NY Slip Op 8390; 145 A.D.3d 818; 44 N.Y.S.3d 452
Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated May 14, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from by the plaintiff, (1) denied her motion for a preliminary injunction; (2) granted those branches of the *819 motion of the defendants Shanah Swartz-Gordon, Nikola Swartz-Hennes, Joshua Swart
State v. Nicholsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-09-19 · Published · cited 0× · 805 S.E.2d 348; 255 N.C. App. 665; 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 769
HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge. *666On 4 May 2016, Ahmad Jamil Nicholson ("Defendant") filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained by law enforcement officers following a traffic stop. On 9 May 2016, the trial court orally denied Defendant's motion *350to
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010-12-07 · Published · cited 28× · 79 A.D.3d 700; 912 N.Y.S.2d 623
*701In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scheinkman, J.), entered September 22, 2009, which, inter alia, granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action to recover damages for ma
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009-02-03 · Published · cited 27× · 59 A.D.3d 403; 873 N.Y.S.2d 148
*404In an action, inter alia, for declaratory and injunctive relief and for ejectment, the defendant Congregation Lubavitch, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from (1) so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated June 19, 2006, as denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, among other things, pursuant to C
District Court, D. Maryland · 2012-09-19 · Published · cited 23× · 891 F. Supp. 2d 757; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134190; 2012 WL 4127619
MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Dawn Stanley’s pet, a young French bulldog named Booker, suffered an intestinal injury after ingesting a piece of a chew toy. That toy was manufactured by T.F.H. Publications, Inc. (“TFH”), a subsidiary of Central Garden and Pet Corporation (“Central Garden”), and marketed under the Nylabone trade name as the. Double Action C
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 57 F.3d 1082; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25658; 1995 WL 66830
57 F.3d 1082NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Jack S. KENNEY, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee fo
People v. Trumppublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04756
People v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 04756) People v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 04756 Decided on August 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department MOULTON, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.