Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Haydel”
United States v. Haydelpublic domain
486 F.Supp. 109 (1980) UNITED STATES of America v. John M. HAYDEL, Jr., et al. Crim. A. No. 79-46-A. United States District Court, M. D. Louisiana. February 27, 1980. C. Michael Hill, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff. *110 Virgil M. Wheeler, Jr., New Orleans, La., for defendants. OPINION O
Haydel v. Zodiac Corp.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court Louisiana denied.
Haydel v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Alexander Haydel v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
04/10/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 7, 2017 Session ALEXANDER HAYDEL v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 12-00988 Lee V. Coffee, Judge ___________________________________
State v. Haydelpublic domain
95 P.3d 760 (2004) 122 Wash.App. 365 STATE of Washington, Appellant, v. Armond HAYDEL, Respondent. No. 51279-0-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. May 24, 2004. As Amended on Denial of Reconsideration and Publication Ordered July 12, 2004. Randi Austell, King Co Pros Att, Seattle, WA, for Appellant. W. Kirkl
State v. Haydelpublic domain
Cox, C. J. A court must allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea when it appears that withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice — an injustice that is obvious, directly observable, overt, and not obscure.1 The validity of such a plea depends on whether it is knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made — a determination made on the basis of the totality of the circumstances.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion July 8, 5 Cir., 1981, 649 F.2d 1152). Before SKELTON ** , Senior Judge, RUBIN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The opinion is corrected so that the last parag
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: The validity of John Haydel’s conviction for materially underreporting his gross wagering income for purposes of the wagering excise tax, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1), turns on the constitutionality of the government’s seizure of his gambling records, for it was primarily by their introduction that he was convicted. The seizure
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: This case concerns the intersection between intellectual property rights and a Mardi Gras tradition. Haydel Enterprises appeals' the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Nola Spice Designs and Raquel Duarte on claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, .trademark dilution, copyright infringement, and unfair trade practices
Walk Haydel & Assoc v. Coastal Power Prodnpublic domain
REVISED February 27, 2008 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 06-30886 February 6, 2008 Charles R. Ful
In Re Succession of Haydelpublic domain
780 So.2d 1168 (2001) In the Matter of: SUCCESSION OF Hilton J. HAYDEL. No. 2000 CA 0085. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. February 16, 2001. Rehearing Denied April 2, 2001. *1169 Earl Reynolds, Baton Rouge, for Appellee John Lieux, Executor of the Succession of Hilton J. Haydel. David H. Garrett, Bato
Succession of Haydelpublic domain
| JAMES C. GULOTTA, Judge Pro Tem. William J. Hart appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to annul judgments decreeing Hart to be an absent person, declaring him dead and placing his parents and siblings into possession of his estate. In his judgment the trial judge concluded that Hart had not met his burden of proving the judgment was obtained through fraud or ill practice. On June 29, 1992, Hart
Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc.public domain
|2CARTER, Judge. This is an appeal from a trial court judgment granting a motion for summary judgment in an action for damages. FACTS On October 18, 1990, plaintiff, Kathy C. Haydel, was standing outside of her home in Schriever, Louisiana, when she was overcome by a cloud of anhydrous ammonia (a chemical used as a fertilizer). The cloud allegedly enveloped her home, forcing
517 F.3d 235 (2008) WALK HAYDEL & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. COASTAL POWER PRODUCTION COMPANY; et al., Defendants. *236 [PG] Latin American Energy Development, Inc., doing business as Delasa, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Winston & Strawn, LLP, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-30886. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Haydel v. Commissioner of Irspublic domain
988 F.2d 1213 Haydelv.Commissioner of IRS NO. 92-4686 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 19, 1993 1 Appeal From: U.S.T.C. 2 AFFIRMED.
Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc.public domain
654 So.2d 418 (1995) Kathy C. HAYDEL, Individually and on Behalf of The Minor Children, Nikki Richard and Michelle Haydel v. HERCULES TRANSPORT, INC., Liquified Petroleum Gas Insurance Company, LPG Risk Retention Group, The Cropmate Company, and Conagra Fertilizer Company. No. 94 CA 1246. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. April 7, 1995. Writ Denied J
11 JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Chief Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE On September 1, 1995, Walk Haydel & Associates, Inc. sued Coastal Power Production Company, La Casa Castro S.A. de C.V. and Latin American Energy Development, Inc. (DELASA) to recover professional engineering fees for services rendered to the defendants in connection with the Nejapa Power Project located in El Salvador. DELASA answered and fil
United States v. Robert Scullypublic domain
Case: 16-51429 Document: 00515332685 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 16-51429
United States v. Medinapublic domain
*1305ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant, Carlos Medina’s (“Medinafs]”) Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Search of Advanced Medical of Doral and Request for Eviden-tiary Hearing (“Motion”) [ECF No. 81], filed November 18, 2015. The Court has carefully rev
United States v. Crabtreepublic domain
ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motions to suppress. (Docs. 13, 22). The government has filed a response and the defendants replies, (Docs. 25-27), and the motions are ripe for resolution. •On or about November 3, 2014, law enforcement officials executed a search warrant at an apartment complex in Saraland, Alabama, specifically, Apartment #