Cases

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge. Anthony Hardnett appeals his jury conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 App. U.S.C. § 1202(a)(1). On appeal, Hardnett challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained in a search of his person. Hardnett argues that the stop of an automo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C. SUKARI HARDNETT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 24-01534 (AHA) v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., Defendant. Memorandum Opinion and Order Two D.C. homeowners su

314 S.W.3d 397 (2010) Anna HARDNETT, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent. No. ED 93988. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. June 22, 2010. Anna Hardnett, St. Louis, MO, pro se. Jeannie Desir Mitchell, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. ROY L. RICHTER, Judge. Anna Hardnett ("Hardnett") appeals the La

897 F.Supp. 920 (1995) Clinton HARDNETT, Plaintiff, v. DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. No. PJM 94-2914. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. September 11, 1995. *921 Joseph B. Chazen, Leslie A. Pladna, Riverdale, MD, for plaintiff. Francis B. Buckley, Baltimore, MD, for defendant. <

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : Criminal Action No.: 19-31 (RC) : RICHARD S. DEVAUGH, : Re Document No.: 25 : Defendant.

Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Concurrences by Judges SCHROEDER and JONES. NOONAN, Circuit Judge: This case involves a difficult question of whether a prosecutor’s violation of a criminal defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause, as applied to California by the Due Process Clause, was of a character to warrant the grant of habeas corpus. The issue is close. The ease is as follows: I

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This matter is currently pending for consideration of Defendant Clifford Leon Houston’s six motions to suppress evidence obtained from the warrantless surveillance of his property with a video pole camera, the January 11, 2013 search of his residence, and the seizure of his person on the same day. [Record Nos. 14, 16, 18, 20, 47, 57, 58] These

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: In the anarchy following Hurricane Katrina, a group of heavily armed New Orleans police officers were dispatched to the Danziger Bridge in response to an emergency call reporting shots being fired at police. There, amid chaos, they shot and killed two unarmed men, one of them developmentally disabled, and wounded four other unarmed civilians. The police then allegedly orchestrated a cover-up to

733 F.Supp.2d 868 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Beverly STOKELY, Defendant. No. 3:10-CR-24. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville. August 5, 2010. *873 Melissa M. Millican, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of U.S. Attorney, Knoxville, TN, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0367p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, -

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 United States v. Jacob, et al. Nos. 03-3348/3351 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0240P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0240p.06 _________________ COUNSEL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

CLAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Carlton D. Robinson appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence, entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio on May 1, 2002. Specifically, Defendant was convicted of possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A), and being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)

PER CURIAM. Defendant-Appellant Toryano Lement Babb appeals from the district court’s decision denying his motion to suppress evidence during his bank robbery trial, that he claims was obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. He contends that Michigan State Troopers had no reasonable suspicion to stop his car, and, in the alternative, he claims that troopers violated his Fourth Amendment rights when they subsequ

285 F.Supp.2d 1063 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Michael CHARRINGTON, Defendant. No. CR-3-98-56. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 5, 2003. *1064 James Duane Brubaker, WPAFB, OH, for Plaintiff. Cheryll A. Bennett, Federal Public Defender, Dayton, OH, for Defendant. OP

334 F.Supp.2d 5 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. Jonathan HART No. CR 01-10314-MLW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 6, 2003. *6 George F. Gormley, Boston, MA, for Jonathan Hart. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WOLF, District Judge. I. SUMMARY Defendant Jonathan Hart is c

OPINION EAYNES, District Judge. Defendant-Appellant Erico Richardson appeals the denials by the district court of his two motions to suppress his statements and other evidence obtained by the Shelby County, Tennessee, deputy sheriffs when they arrested Richardson for possessing cocaine with intent to distribute. Because the deputy sheriffs did not coerce Richardson into making incriminating statements after

OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge: Richard Long appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized after his vehicle was stopped, based on the police’s belief that Long was involved in a reported burglary. For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s denial of the motion to suppress.