Cases

53 F.3d 343NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UNITED STATES of America, Pla

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge. This case raises the question of whether the district court may employ the All Writs Act (AWA) to compel the condemnation of land adjacent to a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) cleanup site because the landowner was allegedly frustrating the district court’s institutional controls order by not accepting the final offer for his property. Because we concl

996 F.2d 312 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UN

750 F.Supp. 1444 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Royal N. HARDAGE, et al., Defendants. ADVANCE CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Hardage Steering Committee, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ABCO, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. CIV-86-1401-P. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. August 8, 1990. As Corrected October

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. This case arises from the cleanup effort at the Hardage Superfund Site (Hardage site), a federally controlled Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) site near Criner, Oklahoma. CERCLA § 101 et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. Third-party-defendants Hardage Steering Committee, et al (HSC) appeal from the district court’s December 8, 1989 order g

733 F.Supp. 1424 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Royal N. HARDAGE, et al., Defendants. ADVANCE CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Hardage Steering Committee Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ABCO, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. CIV-86-1401-P. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. December 8, 1989.

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. This case arises from the cleanup effort at the Hardage Superfund Site (Hardage Site), a federally controlled Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) site near Criner, Oklahoma. CERCLA §§ 101-405, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675. Third-party-defendants The O’Brien Corporation and Jones-Blair Company (Appellants) appeal from the district court’s September 22, 1989 order ap

TACHA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant United States Pollution Control, Inc. (“USPCI”) appeals a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma finding USPCI liable in indemnification for McDonnell Douglas Corporation’s (“MDC”) costs relating to the Hardage Superfund Site and awarding attorneys’ fees and prejudgment interest. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §' 1291 and affirm

750 F.Supp. 1460 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Royal N. HARDAGE, et al., Defendants. ADVANCE CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Hardage Steering Committee, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ABCO, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. CIV-86-1401-P. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. August 9, 1990. As Corrected October

761 F.Supp. 1501 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Royal N. HARDAGE, et al., Defendants. ADVANCE CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Hardage Steering Committee Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ABCO, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. CIV-86-1401-P. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. May 23, 1990.

663 F.Supp. 1280 (1987) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Royal N. HARDAGE, et al., Defendants. No. CIV-86-1401-W. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. April 9, 1987. *1281 *1282 F. Henry Habicht, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Bonnie A. Sullivan, Land and Natural Resources Div., U.S.

ORDER LEE R. WEST, District Judge. Plaintiff, United States of America, moves this Court to strike certain affirmative defenses asserted by Defendants J.O.C. Exploration Co., Inc. (“J.O.C.”), DalWorth Industries, Inc. (“Dal-Worth”), Foster Feed & Seed Company (“Foster”), Oklahoma National Stockyards (“Stockyards”) and the Consolidated Defendants, pursuant to Rule 12(f) Fed.R.Civ.P. On

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

58 F.3d 569 41 ERC 1085, 64 USLW 2005, 32Fed.R.Serv.3d 968 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,v.Royal N. HARDAGE, et al., Defendants,HARDAGE STEERING COMMITTEE, et al., Defendants andThird-Party Plaintiffs/Appellees,v.William C. WHITEHEAD, Third-Party Defendant/Appellant,andIlene Whitehead, Additional Third-Party Defendant,United States of America, acting through the Farmers Home

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HUGH HARDAGE,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 03-35906 CBS BROADCASTING INC., a New D.C. No. York Corporation; VIACOM TELEVISION STATIONS INC., a  CV-02-01303-JCC ORDER AND Delaware Corporation; VIACOM A

427 F.3d 1177 Hugh HARDAGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CBS BROADCASTING INC., a New York Corporation; Viacom Television Stations Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Viacom Broadcasting of Seattle Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Kathy Sparks, an individual, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-35906. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 3, 2005.