Cases

801 F.Supp.2d 1247 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Salim Ahmed HAMDAN. CMCR 09-002. United States Court of Military Commission Review. June 24, 2011. *1253 Joseph M. McMillan argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Harry H. Schneider, Jr., Charles C. Sipos, Adam Thurschwell, and Captain Michael G. Thieme, U

891 F.Supp. 88 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Jamil HAMDAN, also known as "Jimmy," and Omar Adel Mohamed, Defendants. No. 95 Cr. 228(JG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 16, 1995. *89 *90 Zachary W. Carter, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y. by Samuel W. Buell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brookl

Kanne, Circuit Judge. *353 Khalid Hamdan appeals his 2014 conviction on three counts related to his activities involving XLR-11, a Schedule I synthetic cannabinoid used to make the street drug "spice." On appeal, Hamdan argues the district court abused its discretion by granting the governme

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1327 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KHALID HAMDAN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-3108 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Marwan Abdulkareem Hamdan

GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring: I join the decision of the Court but, with respect to its holding Mr. Hamdan’s appeal of his criminal conviction by military commission is not moot, I do so only because precedent so dictates. I write separately to explain the unfortunate state of that precedent, which requires us to review the conviction of a man long since transferred to Yemen who, even if his

OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: Naji Hamdan, Hossam Hemdan, and the ACLU Foundation of Southern California (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to several federal agencies in Plaintiffs’ suit under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). Plaintiffs contend that: (1) two agencies did not conduct adequate search

528 F.3d 986 (2008) Jalal Abu HAMDAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 07-2702. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 10, 2008. Decided June 16, 2008. *987 Saadia Siddique, Erin C. Cobb (argued), Kriezelman Burton & Associates, C

626 F.Supp.2d 1119 (2007) Ziad Kamal Bou HAMDAN, Plaintiff, v. Michael CHERTOFF, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorney General, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Raymond P. Adams, District Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, El Paso District Office, Betty Garcia, Officer in Charge of United States Citizenship Immigration Services,

*566 Justice Stevens announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I through IV, Parts VI through VI-D-iii, Part VI-D-v, and Part VII, and an opinion with respect to Parts V and VI-Div, in which Justice Souter,

C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1002.] Motion of former Federal Judges Shirley M. Hufstedler and William A. Norris for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of petitioner for leave to file surreply regarding respondents’ motion to dismiss granted. Further consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction deferred to the hearing of the case on the merits. A total of 90 minutes is allotte

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT Thomas J. Tucker, United States Bankruptcy Judge This case is before the Court on the Debtor’s motion entitled “Defendant’s'Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 55(c) and F.R.C.P. 60(b), Deny Plaintiffs Motion for Contempt and Stay the Court’s Order for Delivery of Property,” filed October 7, 2

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.

C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1002.] Motion of petitioner for order directing the parties to submit supplemental briefing denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

56 F.3d 74NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Sharif Kader HAMDAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10389. United States Co

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Husam Fakhri Ham-dan, a native of Kuwait and former resident of Jordan, petitions the court for review of two orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), one affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for adjustment of status and the other denying his motion to the BIA to reconsider its su

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

543 U.S. 1096 HAMDANv.RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL. No. 04-702. Supreme Court of United States. January 18, 2005. 1 C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.