Cases

15‐996 United States v. Halloran UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2015 (Argued: January 26, 2016 Decided: April 28, 2016) Docket No. 15‐996‐cr

GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Daniel J. Halloran appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the Unitéd States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kenneth M. Kara's, Judge) on two counts of wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1346; two counts of violating the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952; and one count of conspiracy to commit both substantive offenses, 18 U.S.C. § 371. Halloran, who was

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 429.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

RICHARD P. CONABOY, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's appeal from the Commissioner's denial of Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") under Title II of the Social Security Act. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff filed an application for benefits on November 9, 2013, alleging a disability onset date of August 1, 2012. (R. 18.) After he appealed the initial denial of the claim, a hearing was held on August 4, 2015,

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

BYE, Circuit Judge. John Lloyd Halloran appeals the thirty-seven month sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s sentencing findings with respect to the amount of loss and the sophistication of his means

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 791.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-1947 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff–Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

DISTRICT COURT ORDER SETTING FORTH THE REASONS FOR AND REAFFIRMING ORDER OF DECEMBER 4, 1970, DENYING BAIL PENDING APPEAL AND ORDER RETURNING RECORD TO COURT OF APPEALS HAUK, District Judge. Pursuant to “Order for Remand, Request for Response by Government” issued by the Court of Appeals on January 26, 1971, remanding the question of *338bail pendi

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

*93 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT JAMES A. RING’S MOTION TO DISMISS LINDSAY, District Judge. I. Introduction This action arises out of the circumstances surrounding the shooting death of Edward Brian Halloran (“Halloran”) on May 11, 1982, allegedly at the behest of reputed Boston organized crime leaders Steven Flemmi (

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

817 F.Supp. 829 (1993) Donald O'HALLORAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. C-92-4244 EFL. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 7, 1993. *830 Lyle Cavin, Jr., Oakland, CA, for plaintiff. R. Michael Underhill, Trial Atty., Torts Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, CA

45 F.3d 436NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald O'HALLORAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15762. United States Cou

Case 1:17-cv-00330-SM Document 23 Filed 01/25/21 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Michael K. O’Halloran v. Case No. 17-cv-330-SM Opinion No. 2021 DNH 019 United States of America ORDER The issue remaining in this habeas case is whether petitioner’s two convictions for using or carryin