Cases

623 F.3d 1214 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffery Eugene HAAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-4012. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 20, 2009. Filed: October 15, 2010. *1216 Webb L. Wassmer, argued, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellant. Stephanie M. Ro

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffery Eugene HAAS, Defendant. No. 07-CR-26-LRR. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. November 26, 2008. Order Denying Motion December 11, 2008. ORDER LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTIO

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Donald J. Haas, II (“Haas”) appeals his conviction and sentence on two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Haas complains that the district court erred in failing to discern the real issues presented in Haas’s pre-trial motions to suppress evidence, and erred in denying the motions; that the district court erred by denying the post-trial motion to dismiss the indi

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Ronnie Haas, who conducted a pharmaceutical drug importation business, on multiple conspiracy charges involving fraud and other illegal conduct relating to Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regulations. The jury also convicted him of aiding and abetting others involved in the illegal conduct and of introducing misbranded drugs i

PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________ No. 97-6823 FILED _________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. Dock

MORAN, Senior District Judge: The Internal Revenue Service attacks a bankruptcy plan of reorganization. The issue is one of characterization. The IRS contends that the plan impermissibly reclassifies the status of tax obligations and that the plan is, in any event, not feasible and not proposed in good faith. The appellees claim that the plan permissibly allocates priority of

42 F.3d 642 U.S.v.Haas* NO. 94-50232 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Dec 08, 1994 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. P-94-CR-07 1 DISMISSED.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-3269 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT A. HAAS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distr

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-4077 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD TODD HAAS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-c

173 B.R. 753 (1992) In re Thomas Milton HAAS and Bernice Elizabeth Haas, Debtors. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Thomas Milton HAAS and Bernice Elizabeth Haas, Appellees. Civ. A. No. 92-0585-P. Bankruptcy No. 91-02118-ABB. Adv. No. 91-00235-ABB. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. December 16, 1992. As Amended on Denial o

173 B.R. 756 (1993) In re Thomas Milton HAAS and Bernice Elizabeth Haas, Debtors. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Thomas Milton HAAS and Bernice Elizabeth Haas, Appellees. No. 92-0585-P-C. Bankruptcy No. 91-02118-ABB. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. July 6, 1993. *757 Lawrence B. Voit, M

891 F.2d 906 U.S.v.Haas** NO. 89-7244 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. NOV 15, 1989 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ala. 2

OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge. Before the court is defendant’s partial motion to dismiss plaintiffs refund claims for tax years 2001-2004 because they are barred by the relevant statute of limitations. Although the delay was not plaintiffs fault, and the fact that he cannot amend his 2001-2004 tax returns is unfortunate, the court’s hands are tied, and it cannot extend the statute of limitations. T

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Same case below, 623 F.3d 1214.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio­rari denied.

893 F.2d 1341 U.S.v.Haas (Thomas M., Jr.) NO. 89-7244 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. DEC 21, 1989 S.D.Ala., 891 F.2d 906 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.

588 F.2d 829 U. S.v.Haas No. 77-3273 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 12/26/78 S.D.Ala., 583 F.2d 216

559 F.2d 29 U. S.v.Haas No. 76-4003 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 8/16/77 S.D.Miss., 552 F.2d 368

552 F.2d 368 U. S.v.Haas* No. 76-4003 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 4/26/77 1 S.D.Miss. 2 APPEAL DISMISSED

OPINION DAN M. RUSSELL, Jr., District Judge. On August 1, 1977, this Court, sitting in the Southern District of Alabama, Southern Division, by designation, heard motions in the case of United States v. Thomas M. Haas, Criminal Action No. 77-36. The defendant, Thomas Haas is charged with obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1503. The motions, all made by the defendant, included a motion to dis