⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. HILDEBRANDT”

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004-03-22 · Published · cited 2× · 60 M.J. 642; 2004 CCA LEXIS 66; 2004 WL 1857117
CARVER, Senior Judge: A special court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of wrongful use of cocaine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of confinement for 30 days, forfeiture of $639.00 pay for one month, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a bad-conduct discharge.
District Court, S.D. New York · 1975-01-14 · Published · cited 5× · 420 F. Supp. 476; 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14367
420 F.Supp. 476 (1975) UNITED STATES of America v. Nicholas HILDEBRANDT, Defendant. No. 74 Cr. 606-LFM. United States District Court, S. D. New York. January 14, 1975. Sidney M. Offer, New York City, for defendant. Paul J. Curran, U. S. Atty., Southern District of New York by Thomas M. Fortuin, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, for the United States. <
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-05-05 · Published · cited 6× · 102 F. Supp. 3d 318; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58394
OPINION AND OipER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge : Plaintiffs in this action, George and Patricia Hildebrandt,. claim that the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”) refused to provide them with applications for farm loans and/or for loan servicing, and that these refusals were made on the basis of'the Hildebrandts’ face, in violation of the Equal C
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-11-06 · Published · cited 2× · 287 F.R.D. 88; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158813
OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for sanctions against the plaintiffs, along with the defendants’ motion to strike a “notice of filing” submitted by the plaintiffs shortly after the filing of their memorandum opposing the motion for sanctions. The defendants seek dismissal of th
Supreme Court of the United States · 1992-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 506 U.S. 878
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1992-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 506 U.S. 878; 113 S. Ct. 225
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1953-05-20 · Published · cited 1× · 113 F. Supp. 577; 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2624
GIBSON, District Judge. Statement of the Case This cause came before this Court for hearing on May 8, 1953, on a motion entitled “Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence”. This motion was filed in this Court on April 6, 1953. The petitioners, Howard Hildebrandt and Robert LaPlante, were arrested on May 21, 1952, on charges the gist of which was armed robbery committed on Government-owned property.
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1956-10-24 · Published · cited 0× · 146 F. Supp. 517; 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2465
DAY, District Judge. This is another in a series of motions to correct sentence which have been filed by the defendant Howard Hildebrandt since he was sentenced on June 24, 1952. On that date, upon his plea of guilty to Counts I and II of the above numbered indictment, he was sentenced to serve a term of five years’ imprisonment on Count I and fifteen years on Count II, said terms to run consecutively. Co
Ohio Supreme Court · 2024-08-08 · Published · cited 3× · 2024 Ohio 2931; 178 Ohio St. 3d 3
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 3.] WEIDMAN, APPELLEE, v. HILDEBRANT, APPELLANT. [Cite as Weidman v. Hildebrant, 2024-Ohio-2931.] Statute of limitations—R.C. 2305.11—Libel—Discovery rule—Discovery rule applies to claims of libel based on reputational injuries when the publication of the libelous statements was secretive, concealed, or otherwise inherently unknowable to plaintiff due to nature
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992-04-03 · Published · cited 19× · 961 F.2d 116; 70 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5270; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6034; 1992 WL 65658
*117 JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Norbert L. Hildebrandt appeals both the judgment and his sentence following his conviction of two counts of submitting false statements to a government agency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1988). The charges were based on Hildebrandt’s sending to the IRS false forms cl
Ohio Supreme Court · 2024-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 2931
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Weidman v. Hildebrant, Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-2931.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or
Supreme Court of the United States · 1984-03-19 · Published · cited 0× · 465 U.S. 1101; 104 S. Ct. 1595; 80 L. Ed. 2d 127; 52 U.S.L.W. 3687; 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1469
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-04-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) RODNEY BRADSHAW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1422 (PL
California Court of Appeal · 2020-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/4/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE VON HILDEBRANDT, B294642 Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC666236 v. STAPLES THE OFFICE SUPERSTORE, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Ange
In Re Hildebrandtpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2010-06-30 · Published · cited 1× · 432 B.R. 852; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 451; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 2002; 2010 WL 2718044
432 B.R. 852 (2010) In re Martha Ann HILDEBRANDT, Debtor. No. 10-40232-LMK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. June 30, 2010. Eric James Haugdahl, Esq., Tallahassee, FL, for Debtor. Mary W. Colon, Esq., Tallahassee, FL, for Trustee. ORDER ON CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF EXEMPTION LEWIS M. KI
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2005-02-02 · Published · cited 20× · 320 B.R. 40; 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 108; 2005 WL 237773
320 B.R. 40 (2005) In re Brian P. HILDEBRANDT, Debtor. Brian P. Hildebrandt, Appellant, v. Joseph B. Collins, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee. BAP No. MW 04-043, Bankruptcy No. 03-44401-HJB. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit. February 2, 2005. *41 Steven R. Weiner, Esq., Springfield, MA, on brief for
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975-04-23 · Published · cited 50× · 514 F.2d 1357; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14997
HOLDEN, District Judge: Angelo Seijo and Nicholas Hildebrandt appeal from judgments of conviction entered upon jury verdicts returned on July 30, 1974, before the Honorable Lloyd F. MacMahon. The indictment, in Count One, charged Seijo, Hildebrandt, Leonard Torres and James Di Domenico with conspiracy to violate the federal narcotic
Supreme Court of the United States · 1962-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 369 U.S. 853
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1961-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 365 U.S. 803
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
New York Supreme Court · 1979-04-11 · Published · cited 1× · 98 Misc. 2d 1062; 1979 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2191; 415 N.Y.S.2d 383
*1063OPINION OF THE COURT Harold J. Hughes, J. The issue presented on this motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action is whether New York’s no-fault law which precludes a plaintiff from recovering basic economic loss (lost earnings and medical expenses) in a personal injury action against the tort-feasor likewise bars the Federal Gov