Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. HILDEBRANDT”
United States v. Hildebrandtpublic domain
CARVER, Senior Judge: A special court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of wrongful use of cocaine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of confinement for 30 days, forfeiture of $639.00 pay for one month, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a bad-conduct discharge.
United States v. Hildebrandtpublic domain
420 F.Supp. 476 (1975) UNITED STATES of America v. Nicholas HILDEBRANDT, Defendant. No. 74 Cr. 606-LFM. United States District Court, S. D. New York. January 14, 1975. Sidney M. Offer, New York City, for defendant. Paul J. Curran, U. S. Atty., Southern District of New York by Thomas M. Fortuin, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, for the United States. <
Hildebrandt v. Venemanpublic domain
OPINION AND OipER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge : Plaintiffs in this action, George and Patricia Hildebrandt,. claim that the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”) refused to provide them with applications for farm loans and/or for loan servicing, and that these refusals were made on the basis of'the Hildebrandts’ face, in violation of the Equal C
Hildebrandt v. Venemanpublic domain
OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for sanctions against the plaintiffs, along with the defendants’ motion to strike a “notice of filing” submitted by the plaintiffs shortly after the filing of their memorandum opposing the motion for sanctions. The defendants seek dismissal of th
Hildebrandt v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Hildebrandt v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Hildebrandtpublic domain
GIBSON, District Judge. Statement of the Case This cause came before this Court for hearing on May 8, 1953, on a motion entitled “Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence”. This motion was filed in this Court on April 6, 1953. The petitioners, Howard Hildebrandt and Robert LaPlante, were arrested on May 21, 1952, on charges the gist of which was armed robbery committed on Government-owned property.
United States v. Hildebrandtpublic domain
DAY, District Judge. This is another in a series of motions to correct sentence which have been filed by the defendant Howard Hildebrandt since he was sentenced on June 24, 1952. On that date, upon his plea of guilty to Counts I and II of the above numbered indictment, he was sentenced to serve a term of five years’ imprisonment on Count I and fifteen years on Count II, said terms to run consecutively. Co
Weidman v. Hildebrandtpublic domain
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 3.] WEIDMAN, APPELLEE, v. HILDEBRANT, APPELLANT. [Cite as Weidman v. Hildebrant, 2024-Ohio-2931.] Statute of limitations—R.C. 2305.11—Libel—Discovery rule—Discovery rule applies to claims of libel based on reputational injuries when the publication of the libelous statements was secretive, concealed, or otherwise inherently unknowable to plaintiff due to nature
United States v. Norbert L. Hildebrandtpublic domain
*117 JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Norbert L. Hildebrandt appeals both the judgment and his sentence following his conviction of two counts of submitting false statements to a government agency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1988). The charges were based on Hildebrandt’s sending to the IRS false forms cl
Weidman v. Hildebrandtpublic domain
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Weidman v. Hildebrant, Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-2931.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or
Morton v. Hildebrandtpublic domain
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.
Hildebrandt v. Venemanpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) RODNEY BRADSHAW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1422 (PL
Hildebrandt v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLCpublic domain
Filed 12/4/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE VON HILDEBRANDT, B294642 Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC666236 v. STAPLES THE OFFICE SUPERSTORE, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Ange
In Re Hildebrandtpublic domain
432 B.R. 852 (2010) In re Martha Ann HILDEBRANDT, Debtor. No. 10-40232-LMK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. June 30, 2010. Eric James Haugdahl, Esq., Tallahassee, FL, for Debtor. Mary W. Colon, Esq., Tallahassee, FL, for Trustee. ORDER ON CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF EXEMPTION LEWIS M. KI
Hildebrandt v. Collins (In Re Hildebrandt)public domain
320 B.R. 40 (2005) In re Brian P. HILDEBRANDT, Debtor. Brian P. Hildebrandt, Appellant, v. Joseph B. Collins, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee. BAP No. MW 04-043, Bankruptcy No. 03-44401-HJB. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit. February 2, 2005. *41 Steven R. Weiner, Esq., Springfield, MA, on brief for
HOLDEN, District Judge: Angelo Seijo and Nicholas Hildebrandt appeal from judgments of conviction entered upon jury verdicts returned on July 30, 1974, before the Honorable Lloyd F. MacMahon. The indictment, in Count One, charged Seijo, Hildebrandt, Leonard Torres and James Di Domenico with conspiracy to violate the federal narcotic
Hildebrandt v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Hildebrandt v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Hildebrandt v. Kalteuxpublic domain
*1063OPINION OF THE COURT Harold J. Hughes, J. The issue presented on this motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action is whether New York’s no-fault law which precludes a plaintiff from recovering basic economic loss (lost earnings and medical expenses) in a personal injury action against the tort-feasor likewise bars the Federal Gov