Cases

PER CURIAM: Herbert Kent Harbison, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for credit for time spent in prior custody pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) (2000). Harbison’s claims challenge the execution of his sentence and cannot be brought in the first instance to the district court under § 3585(b). United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 112 S.Ct. 1351, 117 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992). Any

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division, denied.

Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 559 U.S. 975, 130 S. Ct. 1689, 176 L. Ed. 2d 187, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2053.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Same case below, 571 F.3d 531.

Chief Justice Roberts, concurring in the judgment. I agree with much of the Court’s opinion. Title 18 U. S. C. § 3599(a)(2) entitles indigent federal habeas petitioners to appointed counsel “in accordance with” subsection (e). Subsection (e) specifies that the appointed counsel “shall represent the defendant throughout every subsequent stage of available judicial proceedings . . . and shall also represent t

(2006) EDWARD J. HARBISON v. BELL, WARDEN No. 05-9419 Supreme Court of United States. June 12, 2006. The petition for rehearing is denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.

541 U.S. 978 HARBISONv.BELL, WARDEN. No. 03-8816. Supreme Court of United States. April 5, 2004. 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM DAVID T. STOSBERG, Bankruptcy Judge. This adversary proceeding comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Defendant, Stites & Harbison. The trustee, Thomas W. Frentz, filed a response in opposition to the motion to dismiss. Upon consideration of the motion, the response, the reply, and the record in this case, the Court overrules the Motion to Dismiss. I

MEMORANDUM OPINION WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint in Intervention (Doc. No. 82), filed by Defendants Anderson and PMC Management, LLC (“PMC”) (together, “Defendants”).1 For the reasons stated herein, the Motion to Dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part as set forth b

*933FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW KANE, District Judge. This action was tried to the court for three days commencing January 31, 1979 and concluded following a protracted recess on February 15, 1979. On September 20, 1979 I entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, and on January 25,1980 made additional findings of fact and conclus

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 28, 2020 Session LAJUAN HARBISON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 111381 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2019-01683-CCA-R3-PC The Petitioner, Lajuan Harbison, appeals as of right from the Knox County Criminal Court’s denial of his pet

Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. Justice White dissents.

Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. Justice White dissents.

SHARON G. LEE, J. A jury convicted LaJuan Harbison of four counts of attempted voluntary manslaughter and four counts of employing a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the convictions and remanded for a new trial, holding that the trial court erred in denying Harbison's request for a separate trial, that his multiple convictions