Cases

537 U.S. 1164 HERNANDEZ, AKA GUADALUPE FRANCOv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-7560. Supreme Court of United States. January 21, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. 2

*1076 O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether Congress has the power to criminalize reentry into the United States by a previously deported alien. I On January 19,1997, Border Patrol agents arrested Guadalupe Hernandez-Guerrero near Campo, Ca

*561 GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Jose Arce-Hernandez was convicted in 1995 and served part of his two year sentence for the felony of carrying a loaded firearm. In 1996, he was deported to Mexico. Four days later, he was found in San Diego and indicted for being a deported alien found in the United States in

PER CURIAM: Jose Guadalupe Hernandez appeals his jury conviction in the Western District of Texas on three counts of firearms violations. We affirm the conviction on one count and reverse the other two.’ In May, 1980 agents for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) learned that Hernandez had made

Opinion issued March 20, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-01080-CR NO. 01-12-01081-CR ——————————— JOSE GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appel

AFFIRM; Opinion issued March 6, 20I3 In The QIourt of Arjirah JFiftl! itritt uf Jixa at 1attas No. 05-11-01300-CR GUADALUPE JESUS IIERNANDEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TE

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Patricio Hernandez-Cordero and his wife, Maria Guadalupe Ortega de Hernandez, appeal the denial of their application for a suspension of deportation. 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(1). We affirm. I. Mr. and Mrs. Hernandez are citizens of the Republic of Mexico. They have resided in the United States continuously since they were married in 1975. Mr. Hernandez is a se

OPINION ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: The issue presented by this appeal is whether the Attorney General abused his *1267 discretion in failing to find that the deportation of an alien husband and wife, whose three of their

793 F.2d 701 Patricio HERNANDEZ-CORDERO and Maria Guadalupe Ortega DeHernandez, Petitionersv.UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 85-4587. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 8, 1986. Barbara Hines, Austin, Tex., for petitioners.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari as to Daniel G. Bello, Fidel Flores, Jose S. Olivarez, Rudy Martinez-Castillo, Lugardo Vazquez-Hernandez, Angel D. Sanabia-Sanchez, Lino I. Carrillo-Hernandez, and Hector A. Cabrera are granted. The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the United States Co

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CONTINUE ON BOND PENDING APPEAL PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Defendant Maria Guadalupe Hernandez’s “Opposed Motion to Continue on Bond Pending Appeal” (ECF No. 156) [hereinafter “Motion”], filed on November 22, 2016, and the United States of America’s (“the Government”) “Response to Defendant’s Opposed Motion to Continue on Bond

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe Delgado-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Delgado-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed cou

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Guadalupe Parkin-Her-nandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 act 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Parkin-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and t

PER CURIAM: Maria Hernandez and Hilda Mendoza, two former employees at El Paso Federal Credit Union, pleaded guilty to wire and bank fraud charges arising out of their modified “Ponzi scheme,” in the course of which they issued “unrecorded” share certificates and misappropriated the proceeds. In this consolidated appeal, both defendants challenge the sentences im

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Guadalupe Diaz-Hernandez moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Diaz-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Hernandez-La Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hernandez-La Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portio

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC BY THE COURT: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a b