Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Griffith”
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Elijah M. GRIFFITH Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Ma
United States v. Griffith, Srpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-244-2 (CKK) ANTHONY GRIFFITH, Defendant. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (May 16, 2023) A five-day bench trial in this criminal matter concluded on March 17, 2023. For his actions at the insurre
United States v. Griffith, Srpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 21-244-2 (CKK) ANTHONY ALFRED GRIFFITH, SR., Defendant. OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (February 16, 2023) This criminal case is one of approximately one thousand arising from the
United States v. Griffith, Srpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 21-244-2 (CKK) ANTHONY GRIFFITH, Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION (May 5, 2023) A bench trial concluded in this criminal matter on March 17, 2023. On the same day, Defendant moved to dism
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. APPEAL NO. 17-1365 In appeal No. 17-1365, defendant-appellant Stormy Bob Griffith timely filed a counseled notice of appeal challenging his conviction and sentence. He was subsequently appointed different counsel, who has since moved to withdraw from the case under Anders v. California ,
United States v. Griffith, Srpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 21-244-2 (CKK) ANTHONY GRIFFITH, Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (March 8, 2023) Defendant Anthony Griffith (“Defendant” or “Griffith”) is charged with four mi
United States v. Griffith, Srpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 21-244-2 (CKK) ANTHONY ALFRED GRIFFITH, SR., Defendant. OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM OPINION (February 6, 2023) This criminal case is one of approximately one thousand arising from t
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
CCA 201600385 DAILY JOURNAL Petitions for Grant of Review Filed
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
CCA 20150195. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues: I.WHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS A CMCR JUDGE TERMINATED THE MILITARY COMMISSION OF JUDGE CELT-NIEKS AND JUDGE BURTON. II.WHETHER, AS APPOINTED JUpGES OF THE CMCR, JUDGE CELTNIE
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600385 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. BRANDON E. GRIFFITH Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the Sentencing Guidelines determinations in this *729matter. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court finds that an enhancement pertaining to loss under U.S.S.G. § 2B 1.1(b)(1) and the two-level enhancement for abuse of position of trust.under U.S.S.G.
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
762 F.Supp.2d 1179 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Heather Lea GRIFFITH and Emeterio Rogelio Trujillo, Defendant. No. 4:10-CR-00463-TUC-CKJ (CRP). United States District Court, D. Arizona. December 16, 2010. *1180 Kimberly E. Hopkins, U.S. Attorneys Office, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff. Greta Maria Vietor, Fede
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
584 F.3d 1004 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Debbie L. GRIFFITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-5156. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. October 27, 2009. *1008 Barry L. Derryberry, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Julia L. O'Connell, Acting Federal Public Defender, with him on the briefs), Tul
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
522 F.3d 607 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonard Duane GRIFFITH, Also Known as Radar; Michael Curtis Lewis, Also Known as Bones; Michael Norris Martin, Also Known as Mikey; and Malachi David Wren, Defendants-Appellants. No. 07-50531. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 1, 2008. *609 Jo
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
533 F.3d 979 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice Kendell GRIFFITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-1734. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 10, 2007. Filed: July 21, 2008. *981 Thomas Ryan O'Toole, Inglish & Monaco, P.C., Jefferson City, MO, argued, for
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Terry Griffith appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Griffith contends that the district court erred by failing to discuss all of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), omitting a
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Gerry Griffith, Jr. pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A), which firearm was discovered in the course of a search of Griffith’s house after Griffith was arrested under controverted circumstances. Before entering his guilty plea Griffith had moved to suppress the gun, but the district court denied the motion to suppress on the
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
362 F.Supp.2d 1263 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Anthony G. GRIFFITH and Rebecca Price, Defendants. No. 04-40106-01-JAR, 04-40106-02-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 1, 2005. *1264 *1265 *1266 Anthony W. Mattivi, Office o
United States v. Griffithpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Michael Griffith appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Carol B. Amon, District Judge), convicting him of possession of a firearm as a felon under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 922(a)(2) after a jury trial. Griffith was sentenced to a term of 32 months’ imprisonment to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. The 32 month
United States v. Griffith, Josephpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-1234 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSEPH GRIFFITH, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.