⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Gregor”

People v. Gregorpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2022-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 8/12/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Shasta) ---- THE PEOPLE, C090171 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 10F7257) v. ANDREW LAWRENCE
Gregor v. Illinoispublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 838
App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Gregor v. Illinoispublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 833
App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Gregor v. Illinoispublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 838
App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Gregor v. Illinoispublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 833; 110 S. Ct. 108
App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 807; 114 S. Ct. 54
510 U.S. 807 Gregorv.Newport Inn Joint Venture et al. No. 93-5301. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 1993. Appeal from the C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner are allowed until October 25, 1993, within which to pa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-08-12 · Published · cited 5× · 112 F.4th 816
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX No. 23-16114 REL. GREGOR LESNIK; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. D.C. No. STJEPAN PAPES, 5:16-cv-01120- BLF Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION ISM VUZEM D.O.O.; ISM VUZEM USA, INC.; VUZEM USA, INC.; ROBERT VUZEM
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-08-24 · Published · cited 28× · 834 F.3d 180; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15558; 2016 WL 4446062
*183 REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge: Defendant Owen Edwards was convicted in 2010 in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Robert N. Chatigny, Judge) of conspiring to traffic in cocaine and marijuana. He now appeals from a judgment of
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2014-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 26 F. Supp. 3d 146; 2014 WL 2767384; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83182
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RONALD R. LAGUEUX, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on motions to dismiss brought by both Defendants. Plaintiffs Bethany A. Gregor and Clovis C. Gregor (“Plaintiffs”) allege that the bank that provided their home mortgage loan fraudulently failed to make required disclosures to them at the time of the loan’s closing. Plaintiffs seek to represent a clas
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016-11-17 · Published · cited 2× · 218 F. Supp. 3d 794; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160411; 2016 WL 6835371
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge Between 2008 and 2012, Applica Consumer Products, Inc. (“Applica”), received roughly 1,600 reports from U.S. consumers that the carafes distributed as part of its Black & Decker SpaceMaker line of coffeemakers were suddenly cracking, separating and breaking at the handle. Some of these handle failures included reports of burns and lacerations. By vir
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017-03-14 · Published · cited 2× · 851 F.3d 1253; 119 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1111; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4417; 2017 WL 977033
Wallach, Circuit Judge. Appellant Russian Recovery Fund Limited (“RRF”), acting through its tax matters partners Russian Recovery Advisers, L.L.C. (“RRA”)' and Bracebridge Capital, L.L.C. (“Bracebridge”), sued the United States (“the Government”) in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, seeking readjustment of partnership items pursuant to the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2015-08-12 · Published · cited 0× · 122 Fed. Cl. 600; 116 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5582; 2015 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1041; 2015 WL 4751147
Taxation of partnership; bona fide partnership; 26 U.S.C. § 704; 26 U.S.C. § 721; FPAA; economic substance; step transaction; Culbertson; penalties; reasonable reliance on tax advice OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This is a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (“TEFRA”) action seeking readjustment of partnership items involving what has c
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 838; 110 S. Ct. 119
App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 838
App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1980-10-20 · Published · cited 2× · 6 B.R. 637
6 B.R. 637 (1980) In re Lyle Robert ERTZ, dba Ertz Trenching, fdba J & L Furnace Cleaning, Debtor. Terry GREGOR, Plaintiff, v. Lyle Robert ERTZ, dba Ertz Trenching, fdba J & L Furnace Cleaning, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 379-00039(C), Adv. No. 379-0001. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota. October 20, 1980. *638</
Rothman v. Gregorpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000-07-11 · Published · cited 786× · 220 F.3d 81; 2000 WL 959484
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns a securities fraud claim against a seller of computer software for misrepresenting its income by failing to expense royalty advances after it became clear that the capitalized value of these advances was significantly overstated. Joel Rothman, representing a plaintiff class, appeals from the December 6, 1999, judgment of the District Court of the Southern District of New Yor
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000-07-11 · Published · cited 429× · 220 F.3d 81; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15952
220 F.3d 81 (2nd Cir. 2000) JOEL ROTHMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; ISAAC AUGENSTEIN, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated; RUEBEN ADVANI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; WILLIAM KELLMAN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated; CATHY ANDERSON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated; PETER J. PROCE, individually and on behalf o
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-04-21 · Published · cited 5× · 404 F.3d 1065; 67 Fed. R. Serv. 42; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6812; 2005 WL 912913
404 F.3d 1065 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Michael Sean GIANAKOS, Appellant. No. 03-2989. No. 03-3965. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 10, 2004. Filed: April 21, 2005. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard Henderson,
Gregor v. Derwinskipublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 1996-01-05 · Published · cited 35× · 911 F. Supp. 643; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183; 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 797; 1996 WL 9621
911 F.Supp. 643 (1996) Gregory GREGOR, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Edward J. DERWINSKI, et al., Defendants. No. 91-CV-6470L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. January 5, 1996. *644 Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin, Rochester, NY, for plaintiff. *645 Brian M. McCarthy, Asst. U.S. Atty., Rocheste
State v. Gregorpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997-02-19 · Published · cited 1× · 1997 SD 14
Unified Judicial System Formatting courtesy of the State Bar of South Dakotaand South Dakota Continuing Legal Education, Inc.222 East Capitol Ave.Pierre, SD 57501 STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FRED GREGER, Defendant and Appellant. South Dakota Supreme Court Appeal from the Fir