Cases

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Docs. 140, 146, 147. The motions are fully briefed and the Court heard oral argument on March 18, 2015. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ and Defendant-Intervenors’ motions for summary judgment will be granted and Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment will be denied. I. Bac

GRAND ISLE SHIPYARD INC; GRAY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellees. v. SEACOR MARINE, LLC, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-31019. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 8, 2009. Before: JONES, Chief Judge, KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circ

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 07-2631 UNITED STATES, Petitioner, Appellant, v. TEXTRON INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, Respondent, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND [Hon. Ernest C. Torres, U.S. District Judge]

NUMBER 13-16-00419-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG INNOVATIVE BLOCK OF SOUTH TEXAS, LTD., Appellant, v. VALLEY BUILDERS SUPPLY, INC. D/B/A VALLEY BLOCK AND BRICK, Appellee. On appeal from the 430th

937 F.Supp. 1051 (1996) COASTAL AVIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. COMMANDER AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendant. No. 92 Civ. 4229 (WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 28, 1996. *1052 *1053 Law Offices of John A. Tartaglia, White Plains, NY (John A. Tartaglia, of counsel), for Plainti

NUMBER 13-16-00419-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG INNOVATIVE BLOCK OF SOUTH TEXAS, LTD., Appellant, v. VALLEY BUILDERS SUPPLY, INC. D/B/A VALLEY BLOCK AND BRICK, Appellee. On appeal from th

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AAKASH DALAL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1040 (TJK) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Aakash Dalal, serving a 35-year state sentence for his role in attacks on New Jersey syna- gogues and a rabbi’s home

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GREEN OCEANS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-141-RCL UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Defendants, and REVOLUTION WIND, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. MEMORANDUM OPINION Forty-five plaintiffs bring this lawsuit to challenge federal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRANSGENDER LAW CENTER and RAPID DEFENSE NETWORK, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:21-cv-2153-RCL UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Transgender Law Center (TLC) and Rapid Defense Network (RDN) bring this Freedo

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50116 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:07-cr-00755- DDP-2 KYLE JOHN GRASSO, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 13, 2016 Elisabeth A. Shumaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GEZIM SELGJEKAJ, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-cv-2145 (CRC) EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Gezim Selgjekaj, proceeding pro se, has sued the Executive Office for United States A

337 F.Supp.2d 146 (2004) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 95-133(RCL), No. CIV.A. 97-289(RCL), No. CIV.A. 97-2416(RCL), No. CIV.A. 96-2747(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 30, 2004. *147 *148

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION ) CENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-810 (RBW)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOOD & WATER WATCH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-1714 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants.

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. New Mexico Rule of Professional Conduct 16-308(E) (“Rule 16-308(E)”) prohibits a prosecutor from subpoenaing a lawyer to present evidence about a past or present client in a grand-jury or other criminal proceeding unless such evidence is “essential” and “there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information.” In a lawsuit brought against the New Mexico Supreme Court, and the state’s Discipli

ORDER This matter is before the.court on the petition for rehearing filed by the state of New Mexico parties, as well as the United States’ petition for rehearing en banc. Upon consideration of the New Mexico petition, the original panel grants panel rehearing in part and only to the extent of the changes made to pages 900-01, footnote 6, and pages 902-03 of the attached revised opinion. The clerk is directed to file the revised decisio