Cases

359 F.Supp.2d 38 (2005) Limpieza CIUDADANA et al., Plaintiffs, v. Aurelio GRACIA-MORALES et al., Defendants. Civil No. 02-2191(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 22, 2005. *39 *40 Salvador Tio-Fernandez, Santurce, PR, Jose R. Ortiz-Velez, San Juan, PR, Roberto A. Fern

PER CURIAM: * Francisco Gracia Ledezma (Gracia), federal prisoner # 30710-077, has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the district court’s judgment granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss his civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The district court denied Gracia’s IFP motions and certified that the appeal was n

674 F.3d 420 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio TURNER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-60917. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 7, 2012. *426 Gregory Layne Kennedy (argued), Erin O'Leary Chalk, Asst. U.S. Attys., Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Clarence T. Guthrie, III (arg

753 F.Supp.2d 492 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Ian NORRIS. Criminal Action No. 03-632. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 30, 2010. *498 Lucy P. McClain, Kimberly A. Justice, Richard S. Rosenberg, Wendy Bostwick Norman, United States Dept. of Justice, Jeffrey C. Parker, Robert E. Connolly, U.S. Dept.

730 F.Supp.2d 1159 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Juana Cesivel GARCIA, Defendant. Case No. CR 10-00595 MMM. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 30, 2010. *1160 Rasha Gerges, AUSA-Office of US Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff. Mark M. Kassabian, Buehler and Kassabian, Pasadena, CA, f

713 F.Supp.2d 595 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. John JOHNSON. Criminal Action No. 04-17. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. May 18, 2010. *602 Brian P. Marcelle, Mark A. Miller, Michael William Magner, Michael M. Simpson, U.S. Attorney's Office, New Orleans, LA, for United States of America. ORD

ORDER Roberto Valadez-Martinez was found in Indiana just weeks after being deported for the third time to his native Mexico. Since 1980 when he was first deported, Valadez-Martinez has used roughly six social security numbers and forty-four aliases. He pleaded guilty to being present again in the United States without authorization, see 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and was sentenced at the high end of the guidelines range to ninety-si

522 F.3d 477 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abel GARCIA-ARELLANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-11276 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 25, 2008. *478 Juan Carlos Rodriguez, Dallas, TX, for U.S. *479 Kevin Joel Page, Dallas, TX

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Defendant Arturo Gutierrez-Ramirez (Gutierrez-Ramirez) challenges a 16-level enhancement of his sentence based on a prior conviction for a “drug trafficking offense” as authorized by § 2L1.2 (b)(l)(A)(i) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”). We conclude that the district court erred in. using a California abstract of judgment

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Giovanny Gracia Moncaleano petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) vacating the decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) granting Gracia’s application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). We grant the petition because the BIA conducted a de novo review of the IJ’s findings of fact and engaged in its ow

514 F.3d 81 (2008) Gerardo A. FRANCESCHI, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; Anthony J. Principi, Defendants, Appellees. No. 06-2677. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 8, 2007. Decided January 30, 2008. *82 *83 El

968 F.Supp. 826 (1997) UNITED STATES of America v. Steven CREA, Defendant. No. 93 CR 506 (SJ). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 26, 1997. *827 *828 Zachary W. Carter, U.S. Atty., Eastern District of New York by Bridget M. Rohde, Assistant U.S. Atty., for U.S. Paul A. Vi

951 P.2d 851 (1998) M.A., individually and as parent and next friend to J.A., and N.A., as parent and next friend to J.A., a minor child, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. S-7593. Supreme Court of Alaska. January 2, 1998. *852 Keenan Powell, Powell & Slaten, LLC, Anchorage, for Plaintiff. Richard

OPINION BRYNER, Justice. I.INTRODUCTION We accepted certification in this case to decide whether a cause of action exists under Alaska law for a physician’s negligent failure to diagnose a pregnancy and, if so, the scope of recovery allowed under that cause of action. We conclude that negligent failure to diagnose a pregnancy gives rise to a cause of action for med

USCA1 Opinion December 23, 1992 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the First Circuit For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 92-1228 UNITED STATES,

696 F.Supp.2d 143 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ONE ROLEX 18K GOLD WATCH WITH LIGHT BROWN CROCODILE STYLE WRIST BAND, et seq., Defendants. Civil No. 08-1339 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 17, 2010. *144 Maritza Gonzalez, United States Attorneys Office, District of Puerto Rico, San Juan

757 S.W.2d 687 (1988) Richard LUCAS et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. No. C-6181. Supreme Court of Texas. May 11, 1988. Concurring Opinion May 25, 1988. Dissenting Opinion September 21, 1988. Walter L. Boyaki, Miranda & Boyaki, El Paso, for Lucas. Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., Austin. Irene M.

398 F.3d 1 Pedro J. ROSSELLÓ-GONZÁLEZ; Luis Fortuño; Miriam Ramírez; Nanette Guevara; Arnold Gil-Caraballo; Larry Seilhamer; José Sánchez; Juan F. Ramírez and Javier Rodríguez-Horta, Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.Sila M. CALDERÓN-SERRA, individually and in her capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico; Aníbal Acevedo-Vilá; The Incoming Government Transition Committee; Gerardo A. Cruz, individually

STEWART, District Judge. On January 7, 1985, following a plea of nolo contendere, appellant Jo Ann Tolla was convicted of income tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201. The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Eginton, Judge) abused its discretion in directing

Kao, Chief Judge: This is an application for review of a decision and judgment in reappraisement sustaining the appraised values of cantaloupes imported from Mexico during the period March 25 through April 3, 1965. Agricolas de Mexico, S. de R. L. de C.V. v. United States, 64 Cust. Ct. 591, R.D. 11689 (1970), rehearing denied March 18, 1970. The cantaloupes involved herein were purc