Cases

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant José Ignacio Goris, convicted of a drug-trafficking offense in the aftermath of a government sting, strives to convince us that he should be granted a new trial based on denied discovery and alleged instructional error. We are not persuaded: after articulating the standard for materiality pertaining to discovery in cr

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time [ante, p. 928] denied.

Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Shortly after Jamie Golden1 was released from prison, the government petitioned for revocation of his supervised release. While in jail pending the conclusion of revocation proceedings, Golden was involved in a prison fight in which he repeatedly battered a fellow inmate. As a result, the district judge found that he had committed an aggravated battery — a Grade A violati

MANION, Circuit Judge. Lloyd Lockwood was charged with possession of a destructive device and with being a felon in possession of a firearm — in this case, a pipe bomb. Before trial, he stipulated to the fact that the object he was charged with delivering into the victims’ family mailbox was a destructive device as defined by federal law. At trial, his theory was that he did not k

568 F.3d 47 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John PAKALA, Defendant, Appellant. No. 07-2092. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 4, 2008. Decided June 12, 2009. *49 Robert M. Greenspan, for appellant. Sandra S. Bower, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Michae

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. In November 2000, defendant-appellant Alejandro Perez pled guilty, in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, to one count of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute at least five kilograms of cocaine and at leas

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Berman,./.), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Defendant Goris appeals from the judgment of conviction entered in the Southern District of New York (Berman, /.) following his guilty plea. He alle

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Dominic L. RUIZ, Corporal United States Marine Corps, Appellant No. 24-0158 Crim. App. No. 202300007 Argued March 18, 2025—Decided August 8, 2025 Military Judges: Adam M. King (arraignme

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and GANNON Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Anderson A. IXCOLGONZALEZ Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Case: 23-50874 Document: 105-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 30, 2025

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and GANNON Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Anderson A. IXCOLGONZALEZ Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Case: 22-60596 Document: 197-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Samuel H. SMITH, Airman First Class United States Air Force, Appellant No. 23-0207 Crim. App. No. 40202 Argued January 24, 2024—Decided November 26, 2024 Military Judges

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Samuel H. SMITH, Airman First Class United States Air Force, Appellant No. 23-0207 Crim. App. No. 40202 Argued January 24, 2024—Decided September 13, 2024 Military Judge

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 101–142 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 23, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 680–778 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are