Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Gonzalez-Gamez”
United States v. Gonzalez-Gamezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerardo Gonzalez-Gamez (Gonzalez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gonzalez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingl
United States v. Gonzalez-Gamezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM*** Gonzalez-Gamez was interrogated on February 22, 2007, after he attempted to enter the United States through the Calexico, California, port of entry in a vehicle containing 33.76 kilograms of marijuana. During the interrogation, Gonzalez-Gamez made inculpatory statements to agents, admitting that he attempted to smuggle marijuana into the United States for money. After revi
United States v. Gonzalez-Gamezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerardo Gonzalez-Gamez (Gonzalez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gonzalez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingl
United States v. Gonzalez-Gamezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM*** Gonzalez-Gamez was interrogated on February 22, 2007, after he attempted to enter the United States through the Calexico, California, port of entry in a vehicle containing 33.76 kilograms of marijuana. During the interrogation, Gonzalez-Gamez made inculpatory statements to agents, admitting that he attempted to smuggle marijuana into the United States for money. After revi
Gamez-Gonzalez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Gamez-Gonzalezpublic domain
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: Jose Alberto Gamez-Gonzalez was convicted for possession of more than five kilograms of a controlled substance (cocaine), with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). The principal issue at hand is whether the Government was required to prove Ga-mez’s mens rea regarding the type and qu
Gamez-Gonzalez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Gamez-Gonzalez v. United Statespublic domain
538 U.S. 1068 GAMEZ-GONZALEZv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-10394. Supreme Court of United States. May 27, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. 2
Gamez-Gonzalez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
21 F.3d 431NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gilberto GONZALEZ-GOMEZ, True Name: Gilberto Gamez-ViverosDefendant-Appellant. No. 93-2663. United
Gamez-De La Cruz v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 78 Fed. Appx. 925 (first judgment); 79 Fed. Appx. 21 (second judgment), 39 (third judgment), 68 (fourth judgment), 77 (fifth judgment), and 87 (sixth judgment).
Gamez-De La Cruz v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 78 Fed. Appx. 925 (first judgment); 79 Fed. Appx. 21 (second judgment), 39 (third judgment), 68 (fourth judgment), 77 (fifth judgment), and 87 (sixth judgment).
United States v. Ahmed Alahmedalabdaloklahpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, AMENDED OPINION *
United States v. Jimenezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1465 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. IVAN CRUZ-RIVERA, Defendant, Appellant. No. 19-1509 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CARLOS JIMENEZ,
United States v. Ahmed Alahmedalabdaloklahpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
United States v. Charleton Maxwellpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1379 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Charleton Everett Maxwell Defe
United States v. Aguirre-Riverapublic domain
Case: 20-50609 Document: 00515971704 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 10,
United States v. Gomezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-435 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:20-cr-00171- JVS-FWS-5 v. JESUS RAMIRO GOMEZ, AKA Hunter, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal
United States v. Gerald Schrampublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30055 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:14-cr-00457- MC-1 GERALD THOMAS SCHRAM, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the Unite
United States v. Heinepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT YATES’S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY Michael H. Simon United States District Judge Defendant Diana Yates (“Yates”) and her co-defendant Dan Heine (“Heine”) are charged with conspiracy to commit bank fraud and making false bank entries, reports, and transactions during the time that they were affiliated with The Bank of Oswego (the “Bank”). Before the Court is Yates’s Moti