Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Gonzalez-Flores”
United States v. Gonzalez-Florespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-1607, 19-1118 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CARMELO GONZALEZ-FLORES, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Gustavo A. Gelpí, Jr., Chief U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Gonzalez-Florespublic domain
Order; Opinion by Judge IKUTA. ORDER The opinion filed on June 8, 2015, and published at 788 F.3d 1094, is hereby amended as follows: *924On page 1099, in the first full paragraph, should be replaced with <We have applied this obligation outside of the context of an alien’
United States v. Gonzalez-Florespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 03-10656 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CR-03-00650-SMM JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ-FLORES, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal
United States v. Gonzalez-Florespublic domain
ORDER A jury found Jose Gonzalez-Flores guilty of one count of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), three counts of distributing cocaine, id. § 841(a)(1), and one count of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, id. § 841(a)(1). The district court imposed concurrent, 63-month prison terms on each count, and Gonzalez-Flores filed a timely notice of appeal. His
United States v. Flores-Gonzalezpublic domain
USCA1 Opinion Can't open 19-2204E2.01a.docx
United States v. Flores-Gonzalezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2204 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. EMILIANO EMMANUEL FLORES-GONZÁLEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Humberto Gonzalez-Florespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50067 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:13-cr-01809-BEN-1 HUMBERTO GONZALEZ-FLORES, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED OPINION
United States v. Humberto Gonzalez-Florespublic domain
OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: Humberto Gonzalez-Flores appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss an information charging him under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 with being an alien found in the United States after he was removed in 2004. We affirm. Gonzalez-Flores may not bring a collateral attack against the removal order underlying his convic
United States v. Flores-Gonzalezpublic domain
*129MEMORANDUM ** Rafael Flores-Gonzalez appeals from the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Because Flores-Gonzalez has been released from custody and is not on supervised release, we dismiss his appeal as moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999). DISMISSED.
Flores-Gonzalez v. United Statespublic domain
C. .A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-Florespublic domain
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Jose Luis Gonzalez-Flores (“Gonzalez”) was convicted of alien smuggling for leading a group of nearly two dozen Mexicans into the United States across the desert. In this direct appeal, Gonzalez claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that certain testimony admitted at trial was irrelevant an
United States v. Flores-Gonzalezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM*** Jaime Flores-Gonzalez was convicted of two counts of bringing illegal aliens into the United States for financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)®, and two counts of bringing illegal aliens into the United States without presentation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). Flores-Gonzalez appeals his conviction on the ground that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated w
Flores-Gonzalez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Flores-Gonzalez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Gonzalez-Gonzales, AKA Soto Flores v. United Statespublic domain
543 U.S. 1095 GONZALEZ-GONZALES, AKA SOTO FLORESv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-7703. Supreme Court of United States. January 18, 2005. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 108 Fed. Appx. 914.
Affirmed and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed June 4, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00920-CV PEDRO ECHARTEA, Appellant V. JUAN D. FLORES AND MARTHA O. GONZALEZ, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 and Probate Court
Gonzalez, Antonio Flores v. Statepublic domain
Modify and Affirni and Opinion Filed February 19, 2013 In The court of tpptat ji iftb ttrftt of ttxa at Oatta No, 05-11-01496-CR ANTONIO FLORES GONZALEZ, Appellant V.
Cruz v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
United States v. Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflec
United States v. Diazpublic domain
OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: Jesse Vasquez was a mid-level leader in the Florencia Trece gang who was convicted of drug-related -crimes for his part in the gang’s drug trafficking operations. The district court sentenced Vasquez to life imprisonment because his two prior California felonies qualified him for a mandatory sentence ■ enhancement under 21 U.S.C. § 841. Four years after Va