Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KISOR, GANNON, and FLINTOFT Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Victor M. FERNANDEZ GONZALEZ Hospital Corpsman (E-3), U.S. Navy

5 F.3d 541NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50597. United State

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 5, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-1153 Lower Tribunal No. 21-8264-FC-04 ________________ Christopher Fernandez, Appellant,

Capital Bonding Corporation (Capital Bonding) appeals the trial court's order denying its motion for relief from final judgment of forfeiture (motion for relief). Manuel Gonzalez-Fernandez, a/k/a Angel Luis Sanchez-Pizarro (defendant), was charged with multiple drug offenses on 23 January 2003. Defendant was released on 28 March 2003 on a $500,000 bond for which Capital Bonding acted as surety. Defendant failed to appear for his scheduled court date in Forsyth County District C

BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Nelson Pereira ("Pereira")'s second motion for change of venue pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 21 (" Rule 21"), the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, and the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. (Docket No. 2305.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Pereira's second motion for change o

FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Nelson Pereira ("Pereira") moves to compel the production of "specific information, and/or documentation" from the New Jersey Ports Authority and American Airlines for the second time. (Docket No. 2273.) Pereira also moves to compel the production of "specific documentation, and/or records" from the New Jersey Department of Corrections, Jersey City State College, and Air Tr

CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, United States District Judge Before the Court is a Motion to State Essential Findings on Record Pursuant to Rule 12(d) of the FRCr Procedure filed by defendant [1] Alejandro Carrasco on August 16, 2018 (d.e. 163 ). Movant again asserts that since none of the alleged transactions involved federal funds, the Court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter to establish a violation of law under

FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Oleg Factor ("Factor") moves the Court to compel specific performance of a proposed forfeiture payment agreement. (Docket No. 1651.) For the reasons set forth below, Factor's motion to compel is DENIED . I. Background On December 2, 2012, a federal grand jury charged Factor and seventeen other individuals w

425 F.3d 1248 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Frank FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Roy Gavaldon, aka Spider, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David Gonzales-Contreras, aka David Contreras-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Dominick Shewmaker Gonzales, aka Solo, aka Domi

BESOSA, District Judge. *267Before the Court are defendants Nelson Pereira ("Pereira")'s and Pedro San Lucas ("San Lucas")'s joint motion for change of venue and severance pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 21 (" Rule 21") (Docket No. 2191); Pereira's motion for change of venue pursuant to Rule 21, the Fifth Amendment Due Process Cl

BESOSA, District Judge. Defendant Guillermo Cruz-García ("Cruz") moves to compel the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") to expunge his criminal records from the National Crime Information Center ("NCIC") database. (Docket No. 307.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Cruz's motion. I. Background On October 21, 2015, a grand jury charged Cruz and th

BESOSA, District Judge. Defendant Luis Rodríguez-Sostre ("Rodríguez") and the United States entered into a plea agreement on February 11, 2016. (Docket No. 4650.) Rodríguez moves to enforce the plea agreement, requesting that the Court compel the United States to amend its sentencing recommendation. (Docket No. 5158.) For the reasons set forth below, Rodríguez's motion is DENIED . I. Backgro

388 F.3d 1199 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Frank FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Roy Gavaldon, aka Spider, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David Gonzales-Contreras, aka David Contreras-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Dominick Shewmaker Gonzales, aka Solo, aka Domi

FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is defendant Wilfredo Rosario-Camacho's ("Rosario")1 motion to withdraw his guilty plea. (Docket Nos. 4729 and 4911.) Defendant Rosario alleges, inter alia , that this Court participated in plea negotiations contrary to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1) (" Rule 11"). (Docket Nos. 4911 and 4928.) Consequently, defendant

OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PÉREZ-GIMÉNEZ, District Judge. As part of his pre-trial pleadings, Defendant Esteban Ortiz filed an ex-parte motion for appointment of expert services pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. See Docket' No. 236. Ortiz sought to hire a physician who specializes in drug addiction. According to the motion, Ortiz intended to submit to the docto

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is the United States’ motion to disqualify defendant Angel Torres Moreno’s attorney because of an alleged conflict of interest. (Docket No. 1744.) The government’s motion includes a request for a hearing on the conflict-of-interest issue. Id. at ¶ 7. For the reasons that follow, the government’s motion and its accompanying hearing requ

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are: (a) Motion to Dismiss the Indictment for Government Misconduct Occurring Before the Grand Jury and Renewal Request for In Camera Inspection of Grand Jury Transcripts with Combined Memorandum of Law filed by the defendant Vanessa Martinez Hernández [106] (hereinafter “Vanessa Marti

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Fernandez-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Fernandez-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant p