Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “United States v. Gonzalez Vicencio”
Rogaciano Galvez-Vicencio v. Merrick B. Garlandpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3018 ___________________________ Rogaciano Galvez-Vicencio Petitioner v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Telly James Arrambide v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-20-00135-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG TELLY JAMES ARRAMBIDE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On app
Siplast v. Employers Mutual Cslty Inspublic domain
Case: 20-11076 Document: 00516161838 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 11, 2022
Joseph Montano v. State of Texaspublic domain
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: Joseph Montano’s felony trial was terminated when the state trial judge declared a mistrial after a witness invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, while testifying at trial. After Texas determined to retry him, Montano unsuccessfully sought relief in Texas court, arguing that a retrial would violate his rights under the . Fift
Joseph Montano v. State of Texaspublic domain
Case: 16-20083 Document: 00514141071 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/01/2017 REVISED September 1, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-20083
*105SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from the opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, J.), vacating the Injunctions against Argentina upon the occurrence of two conditions precedent. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case and therefore addre
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,