Cases

538 U.S. 914 GOMEZ-VAZQUEZ, AKA GOMEZ-VASQUEZv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-8735. Supreme Court of United States. March 10, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. 2

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: Jose Rodrigo Vasquez was arrested when he delivered to an undercover police officer five one-kilogram packages of cocaine contained in a red gym bag. After his arrest, the police conducted a warrant-less search of his car, and of several items found in the car. The police asked Vasquez if he had any more cocaine at his apartment. Vasquez repli

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Defendants Steve Tristan Vasquez (“Vasquez”), Alfredo Paul Guajardo (“Gua-jardo”) and Daniel Gomez, Jr. (“Gomez”)— found guilty (1) of conspiring to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B) and 846, and (2) of aiding and abetting the possession of more than 100 kilograms of marijuana with in

VANCE, Circuit Judge: Jose Gilliatt Gomez-Gomez, Pedro Vasquez-Castro, Luis Armando Rios-Rico, Nestor Villalobos-Lorduiz, and Thomas Charley Snow appeal their convictions and sen- *1009 fences resulting from drug smuggling. We affirm. On May 21, 1985, the Coast Guard cutt

829 F.2d 1132 U.S.v.Gomez-Gomez (Jose Giliatt), Vasquez-Castro (Pedro),Rios-Rico (Luis Armando), Villalobos-Lorduiz(Nestor), Snow (Thomas Charley) NO. 86-5328 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. SEP 02, 1987 Appeal From: S.D.Fla., 822 F.2d 1008 1

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Gomez Vasquez has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gomez Vasquez has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for

*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

PER CURIAM: * Jesus Padilla-Gomez (Padilla) appeals the sentence he received for illegally reentering the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. Padilla argues that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by characterizing each of his prior state felony convictions for possession of controlled substances as “aggravated felonies” for purposes of U.S.S.G.

*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1098C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 122; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 360 F. 3d 1339; *1099No. 03-10727. No. 03-10742. No. 03-10752. No. 03-10755. <

PER CURIAM: * Pedro Anaya-Gomez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States. He argues that the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Anaya-Gomez’s *300constitutional challenge is foreclo

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.