Cases

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

688 F.2d 849 U. S.v.Franco-Gomez 81-1685 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 8/16/82 1 S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

944 F.2d 959 UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Alvaro ROJO-ALVAREZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Adalberto FRANCO-MONTOYA, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Walter Antonio PALACIO-PEREZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Carlos AREVALO-GOMEZ, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 90-1980 to 90-1983. United States Court of Appeals,

SUMMARY ORDER Fernando Ramirez-Zapata appeals from an order entered on December 28, 2005, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, J.), declining to resentence Ramirez-Zapata after remand to the district court pursuant to United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005). Ramirez-Zapata was convicted after a jury trial of conspiracy to distribute and poss

677 S.W.2d 231 (1984) Simon GOMEZ, et al., Appellants, v. Carlos FRANCO, et al., Appellees. No. 13-83-355-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. August 31, 1984. *232 Ruben R. Pena, King & Odum, Mission, for appellants. R.A. Vidaurri, Flores, Sanchez, Vidaurri, Munoz & Guerra, McAllen, for appellees.

SUMMARY ORDER The appellant, Fernando Ramirez-Zapata, appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine base, conspiracy to commit bribery, and bribery. Ramirez-Zapata contends that the district court erred, first, by admitting as evidence of the charged conspiracy and without a limiting instruction documents and other evidence seized nearly four years afte

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 426 (third judgment) and 432 (sixth judgment); 72 Fed. Appx. 213 (fifth judgment), 980 (second judgment), and 981 (fourth judgment); 74 Fed. Appx. 358 (first judgment).

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 426 (third judgment) and 432 (sixth judgment); 72 Fed. Appx. 213 (fifth judgment), 980 (second judgment), and 981 (fourth judgment); 74 Fed. Appx. 358 (first judgment).

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1610 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JOSÉ M. CEBALLOS, t/n José M. Guzmán-Ceballos, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Silvia L. Carreño-Coll, U.S. District Judge]

PROST, Circuit Judge. Donald O’Connor, et al., (collectively “appellants”) appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their complaint for lack of jurisdiction. O’Connor v. United States, 50 Fed.Cl. 285 (2001). Because the court erred in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case, we reverse the court’s dismissal. Because the court correctly granted, in the alternati

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1857 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. NYCOLE AMAURY ROSARIO SÁNCHEZ, t/n Nyckole Amaury Rosario Sánchez, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CARLOS REYES, JR., Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. George A. O’Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1699 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. LUIS O. PÉREZ-GREAUX, T/N LUIS ORLANDO PÉREZ-GREAX, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

ARCHER, Chief Judge. Pedro Romero et al. (Romero), the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. (AFGE), and the American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO, et al. (APWU), appeal from the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Civil Nos. 89-0412(JAF), 90-1117(JAF) and 90-1173(JAF) (May 28, 1991). The district court upheld the validity of

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH September 30, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1311 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RAFAEL SOLER-MONTALVO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Gustavo A. Gelpí, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1652 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CRISTIAN SERRANO-DELGADO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30055 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00111- v. WFN-17 GERARDO FARIAS-CONTRERAS, AKA Tomas Gomez, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-1188, 19-1010 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. CARLOS VELAZQUEZ-FONTANEZ, Defendant, Appellant. No. 18-1215 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. RUBEN COTTO-ANDINO, a/

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30055 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr- 00111-WFN-17 v. GERARDO FARIAS-CONTRERAS, OPINION AKA Tomas Gomez, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Wm. Fremming