Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-435 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:20-cr-00171- v. JVS-FWS-5 JESUS RAMIRO GOMEZ, AKA Hunter, OPINION Defendant

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-435

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before MONAHAN, HOUTZ, and MYERS Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Alejandro Gomez Private (E-1), U.S. Marine

Case: 17-20526 Document: 00516170143 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/18/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED Ja

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before WOODARD, FULTON, and GERDING, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Oscar GOMEZ Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 2, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE T

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-435 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:20-cr-00171- JVS-FWS-5 v. JESUS RAMIRO GOMEZ, AKA Hunter, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600331 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. GERARDO R. GOMEZ Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

DRONEY, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises out of a traffic stop of Defendant-Appellant Brayan Gomez. During surveillance in connection with a heroin-trafficking investigation in Hartford, Connecticut, officers observed Gomez commit several traffic violations and stopped his car. During the five-minute traffic stop, the officers prolonged the seizure by asking Gomez narcotics-related questions not pert

24-1943-cr United States v. Gomez United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2024 No. 24-1943-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. STEVEN GOMEZ, Defendant, ADAM GOMEZ

16‐181‐cr United States v. Gomez 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term, 2016 7 No. 16‐181‐cr 8 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 10

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the re

JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge, dissenting: Because I would conclude that the district court plainly erred in its application of a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i), I respectfully dissent. Gomez was convicted under Colorado statute section 18-18-405(l)(a). The Colorado Supreme Court concluded in People v. Abiodun, 111 P.3d 462, 466 (Colo. 2006), that the

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Emilio Resendez Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Youani Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions o

Judge OHLSON delivered the opinion of the Court. Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial with enlisted representation convicted Appellant of aggravated sexual assault, aggravated sexual contact, and indecent exposure, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2006). The court-martial also convicted Appellant of violating a lawful general order by engaging in

Saris, C.J. INTRODUCTION Defendant Marvin Odiel Gomez-Ramirez moves to dismiss the indictment charging *229him with illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Relying on Perei

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, United States District Judge Defendants Jorge Gomez, Sandy Gomez, and Carolina Ramon-Baez are charged with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. (Dkt. No. 1) Sandy Gomez has moved to suppress all physical evidence recovered at the time of his Dec

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cirilo Gomez, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gomez, No. 1:10-cr-00033-WO-2 (M.D.N.C. July 18, 2016). We