Cases

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Shortly after Jamie Golden1 was released from prison, the government petitioned for revocation of his supervised release. While in jail pending the conclusion of revocation proceedings, Golden was involved in a prison fight in which he repeatedly battered a fellow inmate. As a result, the district judge found that he had committed an aggravated battery — a Grade A violati

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600046 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. JONATHAN C. GOLDEN Seaman (E-1), U.S. Navy Appellant

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600303 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. QUENTERIAS D. GOLDEN-FRANKLIN Fire Controlman Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Ap

669 F.3d 901 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jason GOLDEN, Appellant. No. 11-2488. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 16, 2011. Filed: February 28, 2012. Alison Ray Hershewe, The Hershewe Law Firm, P.C., Joplin, MO, for appellant. Philip M. Koppe, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO (Beth Phillips,

ORDER A § 3582(c)(2) request for sentence modification is discretionary, United States v. Cunningham, 554 F.3d 703, 707 (7th Cir.2009), even for defendant Stephen Golden whose Guideline range was lowered to 360 months to life from a range of life, and despite Golden’s argument to the contrary a district judge is permitted to have a sentence alone which is what the judge did in Golden’s case. Id. The district judge did

679 F.Supp.2d 980 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Tony Terrell GOLDEN, Defendant. No. CR 09-4038-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. January 12, 2010. *981 Martha A. Fagg, U.S. Attorney's Office, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. Sergio Torres, Storm Lake, IA, pro se. Maria A.

ORDER A § 3582(c)(2) request for sentence modification is discretionary, United States v. Cunningham, 554 F.3d 703, 707 (7th Cir.2009), even for defendant Stephen Golden whose Guideline range was lowered to 360 months to life from a range of life, and despite Golden’s argument to the contrary a district judge is permitted to have a sentence alone which is what the judge did in Golden’s case. Id. The district judge did

PER CURIAM: A jury convicted Gertrude Armstrong Golden of five counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (2000) (Counts One through Five), one count of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (2000) (Count Six), and one count of making false statements during bankruptcy proceedings, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152 (2000) (Count Seven). She was sentenced to 42 months’ imprisonment on each count to be s

OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: The United States petitioned the district court for an order enforcing a Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) subpoena served on Golden Valley Electric Association (“Golden Valley”) for power consumption records concerning three customer residences. The court granted the petition and ordered compliance. Golden Val

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge United States District Court Julie Scharber, Kirsten Hahn, Barbara Shoemaker, and Melissa Farr (collectively “relators”) brought this qui tam action pursuant to the Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., and the Minnesota False Claims Act (“MFCA”), Minn. Stat. § 15C.01 et seq,,

ROVNER, Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur in my brother’s very fine opinion. I agree that treating failure to report to jail as a violent felony is a logical extension of our earlier decision treating failure to return to a halfway house as a violent felony. See United States v. Bryant, 310 F.3d 550 (7th Cir.2002). The risk to law enforcement is likely the same in capture as it is in recapture. De

*272 JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court and on the briefs of the parties. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Golden’s appeal be denied. Golden is precluded from challenging his conviction of bribery of a public official, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201, on the g

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Appellant Kenneth Golden appeals from the District Court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We will affirm. I. Because we write solely for the parties and not for publication, we need not set forth a detailed recitation of the background for this appeal and will limit our discussion to res

Slip Op. 07-39 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ____________________________________ : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : Before: Judith M. Barzilay, Judge : Court No. 03-00005 v. :

469 F.Supp.2d 1338 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN GATE PETROLEUM CO., Defendant. Slip Op. 07-5. Court No. 03-00005. United States Court of International Trade. January 17, 2007. *1339 Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; (Barbara S. Williams), Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office; (

JUDGMENT ORDER BARZILAY, Judge: Upon reading plaintiff United States’ motion for summary judgment and defendant Golden Gate Petroleum Company’s response thereto, and upon consideration of other papers and proceedings had herein and upon due deliberation, it is hereby: ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, granted, and it is further

ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Golden Gate Petroleum, Co.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

OPINION BARZILAY, Judge: Plaintiff, the United States (the “Government”), commenced this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1582(3) to recover unpaid duties in the amount of $ 1,359,172.50 and accrued interest claimed to be due on one entry made by Defendant at the port of San Francisco, California, on October 8, 1985. The parties have filed cross-mo

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-307C (Filed: November 10, 2021) ******************** LARRY GOLDEN, Patent infringement; 28 Plaintiff, U.S.C. § 1498(a); RCFC Patent Rule 4; Preliminary v. infringement contentions;

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-1893C (Filed under seal: July 2, 2025) (Filed: July 14, 2025) ) GOLDEN IT, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. )