Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 07-cr-00152-4 (ESH) ) ERNEST MILTON GLOVER,

JOAN A. LENARD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Thomas Randolf Glover's pro se Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to Section 404 of the First Step Act, ("Motion," D.E. 399), filed January 3, 2019. On January 18, 2019, the Government filed a Response opposing the Motion. ("First Response," D.E. 400.) On February 26, 2019, the Court appointed the Federal Public Defende

ORDER Upon consideration of appellant’s notice of dismissal, his motion to dismiss appeal, and the affidavit in support thereof, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted, and this case be dismissed. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 34-35 (2016).

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Filing motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Ernest Glover and Helery Price now seek to vacate their convictions for conspiracy to distribute phencyclidine (“PCP”) on the basis that they have been deprived of their Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel at trial and o

Case: 24-30431 Document: 128-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-30431

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Solomon Glover seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of app

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 15, 2018, be affirmed. Appellant sought a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582

662 F.3d 694 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Ramon GLOVER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-4462. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: October 28, 2011. Decided: December 9, 2011. ARGUED: Matthew Segal, Federal Defenders of Western North Carolina, Inc., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Richard Lee

CCA 201100211. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE LOWER COURT MISAPPLIED UNITED STATES v. FOSLER AND UNITED STATES v. WATKINS IN FINDING THAT, DESPITE FAILING TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT, THE ARTICLE 134 SPECIFICATIONS HERE STATE AN OFFENSE. No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

PER CURIAM: Stephen H. Harris, appointed counsel for Tyrone Vincent Glover, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to "withdraw is GRANTED, and Glover’s conviction and sentence

ORDER Jimmy Glover, who is presently 38 years old, videotaped a girl engaging in sexually explicit conduct, sometimes with him, on at least six different occasions when she was between 13 and 16 years old. Glover gave the girl an intoxicant (known as “canned air” or “duster”), and in the videos she appears semi-conscious. Authorities eventually discovered and seized the videos, plus hundreds of computer files containing child pornograph

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F| L E D ) JAN 2 0 ZUFU UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) U.S. ) DISTR#CTCOURT ) v. ) No. 09-CR-129 (ESH) ) LONNELL GLOVER, et al. ) ) ) Defendants. ) j MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is defendant Lonnell Glover’s motion to continue the January 25, 2010 trial date. Mr. Glover argues that a continuance is appropriate because he believes the Court denied his June 25, 2009 motion seeking release of f`unds and properties in or

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(d). It is ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed as moot. Appellants were indicted on April 17, 2008, for conspiracy to distribu

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(d). It is ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed as moot. Appellants were indicted on April 17, 2008, for conspiracy to distribu

583 F.Supp.2d 5 (2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Lonnell G. GLOVER, et al., Defendants. Criminal Action No. 07-153 (TFH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 3, 2008. *7 Anthony F. Scarpelli, John K. Han, William John O'Malley, Jr., U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for United States of America.

558 F.3d 71 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James GLOVER, Defendant, Appellant. No. 07-1983. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard April 11, 2008. Decided February 26, 2009. *74 Charles W. Rankin, with whom Michelle Menkin and Rankin & Sultan, were on brief, for appellant.

583 F.Supp.2d 21 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Lonnell G. GLOVER, et al., Defendants. Criminal Action No. 07-153(TFH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 22, 2008. *24 Anthony F. Scarpelli, John K. Han, William John O'Malley, Jr., U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 07-1983 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JAMES GLOVER, Defendant, Appellant. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on February 26, 2009, is amended as follows: On page 7, footnote 1, line 8, substitute "effect" with "affect"

ORDER AND JUDGMENT** PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Alex Glover Jr. pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) & 924(e), and was sentenced to 180 months imprisonment followed by five years of supervised release. Mr. Glover challenges, on Fourth and Fifth Amendment grounds, the district court’s denial of his motion to suppre

MEMORANDUM ** Timothy Ray Glover appeals from two judgments of the district court which revoked his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Glover’s arguments are foreclosed by Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 713, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000), which held that both custody and an additional term of supervised releas