Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Global Positioning System”
Connected Global Solutions, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the Gnited States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-292C Filed: June 2, 20227 Reissued: June 21, 2022 CONNECTED GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, and AMERICAN ROLL-ON ROLL-OFF CARRIER GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, and HOMESAFE ALLIANCE, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant. ORDER Although the merits are not yet at issue, the Court must decide whether to supplement the Administrative Record in this post-award bid protest. Plaintiff, American Roll-On Roll-Off Carri
Connected Global Solutions, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-292C (consolidated with 22-317C) Filed: October 28, 2022 Reissued: November 15, 2022 † CONNECTED GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, and AMERICAN ROLL-ON ROLL-OFF CARRIER GROUP INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, and H
Connected Global Solutions, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the Gnited States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 22-292C & 22-317C (consolidated) Filed: April 21, 2022 Reissued: May 6, 2022° CONNECTED GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, and AMERICAN ROLL-ON ROLL-OFF CARRIER GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, and HOMESAFE ALLIANCE, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant. ORDER In this post-award bid protest, Plaintiff, American Roll-on Roll-off Carrier Group, Inc. (“ARC”), claims that awardee, HomeSafe Alliance, LLC (‘HomeSafe”), mate
Bancroft Global Dev. v. United Statespublic domain
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Bancroft Global Development, Michael Stock, and Melissa Bates Stock seek the return of documents seized during the execution of a search warrant in 2011, as well as money damages for the allegedly unlawful disclosure of their confidential tax return information. In particular, Plaintiffs allege that employees of several fede
Global Dynamics, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-1875C (E-Filed: July 5, 2018)1 ) GLOBAL DYNAMICS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, )
System Studies & Simulation, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER HADJI, Judge. This is a post-award bid protest arising from the U.S. Army’s handling of an Advanced Helicopter Flight Training Support (AHFTS) Services Acquisition. Plaintiffs, three disappointed offerors, challenge the Army’s alleged failure to conduct discussions, evaluation of proposals, and ultimate decision to award the AHFTS contract to CAE, Inc. (CAE or Intervenor). Before the Court are motions for judgment on the administrati
Mondelez Global LLC v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION Restani, Judge: This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment made by plaintiff Mondelez Global LLC (Successor to Cadbury Adams USA, LLC) (“Monde-lez”), an importer of gum base used in manufacturing chewing gum, and defendant United States (“the government”). See Def.’s Mem. in Supp. of the Mot. for Partial Summ. J. 1, ECF
Global Dynamics, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-1875C (E-Filed: March 14, 2018)1 ) GLOBAL DYNAMICS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, )
E&I Global Energy Services, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-244C Filed: January 10, 2022 E&I GLOBAL ENERGY SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Joseph Whitcomb, Whitcomb, Selinsky, P.C., Denver, CO, for Plaintiff. Christopher L. Harlow, Trial Attorney, Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division,
E&I Global Energy Services, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-244C Filed: February 22, 2021 E&I GLOBAL ENERGY SERVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Joseph Whitcomb, Whitcomb, Selinsky, P.C., Denver, CO, for Plaintiff. Christopher L. Harlow, Trial Attorney, Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civi
Sallyport Global Holdings, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Bid Protest; Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; United States Army Corps of Engineers; Harmless Error; Mandatory Minimum Requirements OPINION FIRESTONE, Senior Judge. This post-award bid protest concerns the unsuccessful bid of plaintiff Sallyport Global
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 19-1205, 19-1515 (consolidated) Filed: February 20, 2020 Reissued: March 11, 20201 ) PAE-PARSONS GLOBAL LOGISTICS ) SERVICES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs,
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1205 Filed: September 24, 2019 Reissued: September 30, 20191 ) PAE-PARSONS GLOBAL LOGISTICS ) SERVICES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, )
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-970C Filed: November 23, 2020 FOR PUBLICATION ALTAIR GLOBAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND (A), LLC, ANDALUSIAN GLOBAL DESIGNATED ACTIVITY COMPANY, CROWN MANAGED ACCOUNTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF CROWN/PW SP, GLENDON OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P., LMA SPC FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MAP 98 SEGREGATED PORTFOLIO, MASON CAPITAL MASTE
IHS Global Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER1 WHEELER, Judge. In this bid protest brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1), Plaintiff IHS Global Inc. challenges the United States Air Force’s planned award of a sole-source contract to Defendant-Intervenor BAE Systems Inc. When awarded, the contract will be for certain specialized information technology services necessary to track parts obsolescence
Liberty Global, Inc.public domain
United States Tax Court 161 T.C. No. 10 LIBERTY GLOBAL, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 341-21. Filed November 8, 2023. ————— At the beginning of 2010, P had an overall foreign
Global Military Marketing, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
(Bid Protest) Pre-award Bid Protest; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); Jurisdiction; Standing; Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) 52.212-l(f); Late Proposal; Supplementation of Administrative Record. OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge. In this pre-award bid protest, Plaintiff, Global Military Marketing, Inc. (“G
United States v. Global Fishing, Inc.public domain
OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: The Russian government sought the aid of the United States government, pursuant to a bilateral treaty, in its criminal investigation and prosecution of Appellant Arkadi A. Gontmakher for illegal crabbing. The district court issued a subpoena for certain *562documents in the possession of Appellant Global Fishing, Inc.
Global Freight Systems Co. W.L.L. v. United Statespublic domain
*782 Fifth Amendment Taking; Breach of Contract; Third-Party Beneficiary; 28 U.S.C. § 1502; Discovery. OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAMS, Judge. Plaintiff, Global Freight Systems Co. W.L.L. (“
620 F.3d 137 (2010) IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chicago, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, State-Boston Retirement System, MF Global Institutional Investors Group, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Michael Rubin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Nanette Katz, Frank Matassa, Sunshine Wire and Cable Defined Benefit Plan Trust, individually