Cases

Appellate Case: 21-1159 Document: 010110724324 Date Filed: 08/15/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 15, 2022

*765MEMORANDUM ** Wilson Gladney appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 110-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(B)(iii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Glad-ne

ORDER After Tony Gladney admitted to violating conditions of his supervised release, the district court revoked his supervision and ordered him to serve an additional 60 months’ imprisonment. Gladney appeals, but his appointed counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gladney has not responded to counsel’s motion, so

ORDER After Tony Gladney admitted to violating conditions of his supervised release, the district court revoked his supervision and ordered him to serve an additional 60 months’ imprisonment. Gladney appeals, but his appointed counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gladney has not responded to counsel’s motion, so

MEMORANDUM ** Julius Gladney appeals his conviction by jury on three counts of distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. Gladney also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial and the denial of his motion for release from custody pending appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The evidence is sufficient to su

MEMORANDUM * Trause Gladney appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We affirm. 1. We need not decide whether Gladney was entitled to a hearing on his motion for resentencing because his attorney waived any right to such a hearing by requesting that the motion be decided without oral argument. In matters of litigation

MEMORANDUM * Trause Gladney appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We affirm. 1. We need not decide whether Gladney was entitled to a hearing on his motion for resentencing because his attorney waived any right to such a hearing by requesting that the motion be decided without oral argument. In matters of litigation

525 F.3d 681 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Andrew Graves GLADNEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-1612. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. May 1, 2008. Howard J. Marcus, US Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Missouri, argued, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Natt Scott Rosenblum, Rosenblum & Schwartz, argued, St

ORDER Steven Gladney, proceeding through counsel, appeals his conviction and sentence. This ease has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Gladney was indicted by a grand jury on one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distributi

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. Same case below, 573 F.3d 1011.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1785 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Terrence Gladney (Gladney) was charged with conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine and distribution of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)-(C), and 846. After trial commenced, and just before closing arguments, Gladney made an oral motion to dismiss the indictment, arguing the government’s nineteen-month delay in bringing his

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

538 U.S. 910 GLADNEYv.PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ET AL. No. 02-8300. Supreme Court of United States. March 10, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. 2

790 F.Supp. 1364 (1992) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. David GLADNEY, Petitioner, v. Howard PETERS, Director, Department of Corrections, Respondent. No. 91 C 5037. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. March 5, 1992. *1365 Jeffrey M. Howard, Cook County Public Defenders Office, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT TO AVOID MECHANIC’S LIEN AND RECONSIDERING DISALLOWANCE OF DEFENDANT’S CLAIM BARBARA J. SELLERS, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs complaint to avoid the defendant’s mechanic’s hen on the following grounds: 1. The defendant performed no work on the plaintiffs home in the fah of 1998 and was