⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “United States v. Gaxiola-Gil”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-04-11 · Published · cited 6× · 749 F.3d 1094
OPINION O’CONNOR, Associate Justice (Ret.): Defendant Charles Lee Gillenwater, II, was charged with two counts of transmitting threatening interstate communications and one count of transmitting threatening communications by United States mail. After determining that Gillenwater was not competent to stand trial, the district court authorized the gover
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-05-10 · Published · cited 93× · 486 F.3d 572; 67 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1167; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11012
486 F.3d 572 Jack N. WHITAKER; Ramon Portillo, aka Candido Gutierrez-Elenes; Avelino Avalos; Eduardo Martinez; Virginia Delgado, aka Edna Cabrera; Ricardo Carrizoza, aka Vicente Lopez-Carrizoza; Lauro Rocha Gaxiola; Antonio Rocha Gastelum, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Gil GARCETTI; Curtis A. Hazell; David Demerjian; Jason Lustig; County of Los Angeles, Defendants-Appellants, andWillie Williams; Dan Harden; Horacio Marco; Chuck Livingston; Kei
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972-04-04 · Published · cited 13× · 457 F.2d 1208
457 F.2d 1208 Gil Munzo LEANO, Petitioner-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 25520. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Feb. 29, 1972.Rehearing Denied April 4, 1972. 1 Gil M. Leano, in pro. per.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-05-09 · Published · cited 232× · 486 F.3d 572; 2007 WL 1366069
GRABER, Circuit Judge. Eight individual Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, who are individuals and entities associated with the City and County of Los Angeles, intercepted Plaintiffs’ telephone calls after having obtained wiretap authorizations by using falsified warrant applications. Plaintiffs also allege that Defendants unconstitutionally concealed the existence of the wireta
District Court, C.D. California · 2003-11-17 · Published · cited 4× · 291 F. Supp. 2d 1132; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20805; 2003 WL 22722037
291 F.Supp.2d 1132 (2003) Jack N. WHITAKER; Ramon Portillo, aka Candido Gutierrez-Elenes; Avelino Avalos; Eduardo Martinez; Virginia Delgado, aka Edna Cabrera; Ricardo Carrizoza, aka Vicente Lopez-Carrizoza; Lauro Rocha-Gaxiola; Antonio Rocha Gastelum, Plaintiffs, v. Gil GARCETTI, Curtis A. Hazell, David Demerjian, Jason Lustig, County of Los Angeles, Willie Williams, Dan Harden, Horacio Marco, Chuck Livingston, Keith Lewis, City of Los Angeles,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 313× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,