Cases

Ct. App/N. C. Certiorari denied.

Post-trial decision, alleged taking of a parcel of land on Culebra Island, Puerto Rico; standards for taking; ownership of property under Puerto Rican law; the government’s claims of ownership; interference with and appropriation of plaintiffs’' property interests; measure of just compensation OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. Thi

Geaham, Presiding Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: The merchandise imported in the case at bar consisted of metal buttons and badges. The buttons are of various sizes, ranging from 45 lines to 24 lines, and are those prescribed by the military regulations of the United States for use on the dress uniforms of the en*95listed men and commissione

Patricia Breckenridge, chief justice Mary Ann Smith filed a petition against the Humane Society of the United States (“HSUS”) and Missourians for the Protection of Dogs, alleging various statements made in documents related to the ballot initiative, the “Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act,” were defamatory and placed her in a false light. Specifically, Ms. Smith alleged the specific statements were defamatory because they fal

Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-13-2007 Emerald Investors v. Gaunt Parsippany Preceden

Appeal from D. C. S. D. Ohio. Motion to dispense with printing jurisdictional statement granted. Judgment affirmed.

534 S.E.2d 660 (2000) George L. GAUNT, Barbara G. Fields, Center for Reproductive Medicine, P.A., Donald S. Horner, and Donald S. Horner, P.A., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald E. PITTAWAY, Nancy O. Teaff, Jack L. Crain, Daniel B. Whitesides, Richard L. Wing, Carolyn B. Coulam, Morgan D. Gainor, Charles J. Gainor, Shelley J. Moore, Kevin C. Moore, and The Nalle Clinic, Defendants-Appellees. No. 98-823.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION BAILEY, Judge Case Summary Appellants-Petitioners Raymond and Sue Schenkel ("the Schenkels") appeal the denial of their petition for grandparent visitation with J.G., their biological grandson and the adoptive son of Appellee Respondent David Gaunt ("Gaunt"). We affirm. Issues The Schenkels present two issues for review:

184 F.2d 284 50-2 USTC P 9412 GAUNTv.UNITED STATES. No. 4479. United States Court of Appeals First Circuit. July 28, 1950.Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1950.Writ of Certiorari Denied Jan. 8, 1951.See 71 S.Ct. 350. Robert F. Bradford, Boston, Mass. (John A. Perkins, Boston, M

492 F.3d 192 (2007) EMERALD INVESTORS TRUST v. GAUNT PARSIPPANY PARTNERS; 119 Cherry Hill Associates, L.L.C.; 99 Cherry Hill Associates, L.P.; Horseheads Commercial Development Partners, L.P.; Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.; John Does 1 Through 10. Gaunt Parsippany Partners; 119 Cherry Hill Associates, L.L.C.; 99 Cherry Hill Associates, L.P.; Horseheads Commercial Development Partners, L.P.; Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P., Appellant

ENOCH, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Carl M. Geupel Construction Company contracted with the United States of America to construct a dam at the Huntington Reservoir outside Huntington, Indiana. Certain types of gravel were to be used in the construction. Geupel was to be paid per cubic yard on the quantity to be determined as the material was in place at the dam site. Geupel then contracted wi

520 S.E.2d 603 (1999) George L. GAUNT, Barbara G. Fields, Center for Reproductive Medicine, P.A., Donald S. Horner, and Donald S. Horner, P.A., Plaintiff-Appellants, v. Donald E. PITTAWAY, Nancy O. Teaff, Jack L. Crain, Daniel B. Whitesides, Richard L. Wing, Carolyn B. Coulam, Morgan D. Gainor, Charles J. Gainor, Shelley J. Moore, Kevin C. Moore, and The Nalle Clinic, Defendant-Appellees. No. COA98-823. <

512 F.Supp.2d 493 (2007) Charles GAUNT, et al. v. LOUISIANA CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al. Civil Action No. 06-4817. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. June 29, 2007. *494 *495 Allan Kanner, Conlee Schell Whiteley, Cynthia Green St. Amant, Kanner & Whiteley, LLC

PER CURIAM. It appearing that appellant sued to recover income taxes alleged to have been erroneously assessed for the tax year 1932; that appellant claimed a deduction for loss in said year sustained in consequence of a sale of shares of stock to two of its stockholders who owned all of-its 100 shares of capital stock, except 6 issued to their wives to qualify them as incorporators; that said stockholders had been partners in

Case: 21-2095 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 01/25/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ROBERT L. DOYON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-2095 ______________________ Appeal from the United States

*251Opinion by Ekwall, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in John Barr v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See John Barr v. United States, 324 U. S. 83.) In acco

C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 293 U. S. App. D. C. 356, 954 F. 2d 787.

24 S.W.3d 130 (2000) Gloria GAUNT and Stephen Gaunt, Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, and Shannon S. McBroom and Norman L. Ernst, Respondents. No. WD 57164. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. April 18, 2000. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer May 30, 2000. Application for Transfer Denied

C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 293 U. S. App. D. C. 356, 954 F. 2d 787.