Cases

21-2134 United States v. Gates United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Argued: December 9, 2022 Decided: October 17, 2023 No. 21-2134 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Appalled by his conviction and sentence on drug-trafficking charges, defendant-appellant Frederick Gates seeks to wipe the slate clean. His appeal presents, among other issues, important questions of first impression in this circuit about the operation of the Speedy Trial Act (STA), 18 U.S.C. § 3161.

745 F.Supp.2d 936 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Tommy Andre GATES, Jr., Defendant. Case No. CR-10-00039 SBA. United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. September 8, 2010. *937 Skye Davis, Trevor Louis Rusin, US Attorney's Office, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff. Angela Milella Hansen, Fede

698 F.Supp.2d 212 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Frederick GATES, Defendant. Criminal No. 08-42-P-H-01. United States District Court, D. Maine. March 24, 2010. *213 Daniel J. Perry, David B. Joyce, Kate Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorneys, Office of the United States Attorney, Portland, ME, for United States of Americ

650 F.Supp.2d 81 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, v. Frederick GATES, Defendant. Criminal No. 08-42-P-H-01. United States District Court, D. Maine. August 13, 2009. *82 Daniel J. Perry, U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Maine, Portland, ME, for United States of America. Michael Whipple, The Hallett Law Firm, Portland, ME

DECISION AND ORDER CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Siragusa, J. This Americans with Disabilities Act case is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed on December 21, 2015, ECF No. 10, by Defendant, the Gates-Chili Central School District (“District”). For the reasons stated below, the District’s application is denied.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* ROBERT H. HENRY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unani*744mously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitt

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0314p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - U

101 F.3d 709 U.S.v.Gates* NO. 95-8275 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Oct 31, 1996 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga., No. 90-00036-1-CR-RLV 2

Opinion of the Court WISS, Judge: In this appeal from a contested general court-martial in which the officer and enlisted members convicted appellant of sodomy,1 we granted review of the following issue raised by appellate defense counsel: WHETHER A SERVICEMEMBER CAN BE CONVICTED UNDER UCMJ ARTICLE 125 FOR ENGAGING IN PRIVATE,[

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3314 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRAVIS GATES, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the So

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0205p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee, │

OPINION OF THE COURT De GIULIO, Senior Judge: Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of two specifications of rape, one specification of robbery, one specification of forcible sodomy, two specifications of kidnapping, and one specification of false swearing, in violation of Articles 120, 122, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Mili

777 F.Supp. 1294 (1991) UNITED STATES v. Robert C. GATES, Jr., Defendant. Cr. No. 91-33-NN. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division. November 21, 1991. Mark A. Exley, Asst. U.S. Atty., Norfolk, Va., for U.S. Thomas L. Hunter, Hampton, Va., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

896 F.2d 558 U.S.v.Gates*** NO. 89-8272 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. JAN 22, 1990 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ga. 2 AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM. Lashone Gates claims for the first time on appeal that a provision in his plea agreement waiving his right to request or receive records pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552 , violates public policy and is, therefore,

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The defendant pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, namely a Glock 22 .40 caliber pistol with a capacity of more than 15 rounds; such possession is a felony, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), punishable by a fine and also by imprisonment for a maximum of 10 years (there is no minimum term of imprisonment). 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2). The judge inc

779 F.2d 54 U.S.v.Gates 84-2266 United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. 11/13/85 1 S.D.Ill. AFFIRMED

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.