Cases

521 F.3d 731 (2008) Anita GARG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-2377. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 11, 2008. Decided April 4, 2008. *732 Frank J. Andreou (argued), Andreou & Casson, Chicago

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE UNITED MEDICAL, LLC, § § No. 148, 2022 Third Party Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below–Court of Chancery v. § of the State of Delaware § MANISH GARG, M.D., §

[Cite as Garg v. Scott, 2024-Ohio-1595.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ANUP GARG, ET AL., : Relators, : No. 113583 v. : HONORABLE W. MONA SCOTT, JUDGE,

900 A.2d 739 (2006) 393 Md. 225 Ajay GARG v. Deepa GARG. No. 97, September Term, 2005. Court of Appeals of Maryland. June 8, 2006. Stephen J. Cullen (Jeffrey M. Geller, Miles & Stockbridge, P.C., Towson, on brief), for petitioner. Richard D. Rosenthal (Tydings & Rosenberg, LLP, Baltimore, on brief), for respondent. Argue

OPINION Martha Hill Jamison, Justice Appellants Sarita Garg, Smith & Garg, LLC, and Garg & Associates, PC (the Garg Parties) challenge the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their motion to compel arbitration. . After the Garg Parties filed their notice of appeal, we ordered the parties to address whethér we have jurisdiction over this appeal

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: In 2012, Plaintiff PetEdge, Inc. (“Pe-tEdge”), a pet supply company, hired The Principal Consulting, Inc. (“TPC”) to implement a new software system that it had licensed from SAP America, Inc. According to PetEdge, TPC’s work on this project was a "train wreck,” resulting in millions of dollars of damages. TPC is not currently a par

881 A.2d 1180 (2005) 163 Md. App. 546 Deepa GARG v. Ajay K. GARG. No. 1707, September Term, 2003. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 2, 2005. *1181 Richard D. Rosenthal (Ferrier R. Stillman, Tydings & Rosenberg, L.L.P., on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellant.

11/27/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 11, 2018 Session ANUPAM SINGLA v. ANUPAM GARG SINGLA Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 44502 Joseph A. Woodruff, Chancellor No. M2017-01278-COA-R3-CV Anupam Sing

Filed 7/12/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 148 Robert Hale, Plaintiff and Appellant v. State of North Dakota; Jack Dalrymple,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 17, 2016 Decided June 27, 2017 No. 15-5056 CARLTON J. BLOUNT, APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

MEMORANDUM ** Surender Kumar-Garg, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th C

525 F.Supp.2d 315 (2007) Rajiv GARG, Plaintiff, v. WINTERTHUR, Defendant. No. 07CV0510(ADS)(AKT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 23, 2007. Weiser & Associates, by Jaimee L. Nardiello, Esq., of Counsel, New York, N.Y., Attorneys for Plaintiff. Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., by Evan J. Spelfogel, Esq., of Counsel, New York, N.Y., A

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 15) MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge : I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Dkt. 15). For the reasons explained fully below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion to

(2008) Rajiv GARG, Plaintiff, v. WINTERTHUR LIFE, Defendant. No. 07CV0510 (ADS)(AKT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 26, 2008. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge: I. BACKGROUND Rajiv Garg (the "plaintiff" or "Garg") was employed by Credit Suisse First Boston ("CSFB") as a superv

Opinion issued April 16, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00898-CV ——————————— ANUJ GARG, INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F OF E.G., A MINOR, Appellant V. KATY JUMPS AND KARLIN ROSE, Appell

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 07-2377 ANITA GARG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court

16 Cal.App.4th 357 (1993) 20 Cal. Rptr.2d 80 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ANAND G. GARG et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B063486. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. June 7, 1993. *358 COUNSEL Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Edmond B. Mamer

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Clifford W. Taylor Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Ma

710 F.Supp. 1116 (1989) Ashok K. GARG v. James R. NARRON and Ebasco Services, Inc. Civ. A. No. G-88-292. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. April 27, 1989. *1117 Robert T. Rice, Angleton, Tex., for plaintiff. Raymond L. Kalmans, Neel, Hooper & Kalmans, Houston, Tex., for defendants. </

MARKMAN, J. We granted leave to appeal to consider whether there was sufficient evidence to support plaintiffs claims of retaliatory discrimination and whether the “continuing violations” doctrine of Sumner v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, 427 Mich 505; 398 NW2d 368 (1986), should be preserved, modified, or abrogated in light of the language of the statute of limitations, M