Cases

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 591); (95 Fed. Appx. 572); (95 Fed. Appx. 677); (95 Fed. Appx. 686); (95 Fed. Appx. 694); (95 Fed. Appx. 576); (95 Fed. Appx. 691); (95 Fed. Appx. 668); (95 Fed. Appx. 693); (95 Fed. Appx. 567); (95 Fed. Appx. 672); (95 Fed. Appx. 616);

USCA11 Case: 22-13822 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2025 Page: 1 of 92 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13822 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Case: 21-50083 Document: 00516308591 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

MOORE, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., C.J., DAUGHTREY, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, JJ„ joined. BOGGS, J. (pp. 416-420), delivered a separate dissenting opinion, in which KRUPANSKY and BATCHELDER, JJ„ joined. OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Petitioners Mario Rosales-Garcia and Reynero Arteaga Carballo appeal the denials of their petitions for the writ of ha

ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Indictment in this case charges Defendant Juan Garcia-Valadez with unlawful *950reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Defendant seeks dismissal of the Indictment o

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT DUE TO INVALID DEPORTATION Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Jose Luis Garcia-Morales’ (“Defendant”) October 16, 2015 motion to dismiss his indictment due to invalid deportation. Def. Mot., ECF No. 33. The motion has been fully briefed. Pl. Resp., ECF No. 34; Def. Reply, ECF No. 35. Upon consideration of the movin

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Ronald F. White of one count of possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(d), 5871, and one count of possession of a stolen firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(j), 924(a)(2). White argues that: (1) the government did not present sufficient evidence that White knew the firearm in his possession had

OPINION KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: Plotting coordinates on a map used to require a sextant, a compass and quite a bit of- skill. Today, anyone can do it with a few clicks of the mouse. This appeal raises a question born of that newfound technological prowess: Are a Google Earth satellite image and a digital “tack” labeled with GPS coordinates hearsay?

638 F.3d 1226 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn Lewis EWING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50131. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 1, 2010. Filed April 7, 2011. *1227 Xochitl D. Arteaga, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for th

617 F.3d 724 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant v. Maurice Ray DUPREE. No. 09-3391. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 13, 2010. Filed: August 6, 2010. *725 Robert A. Zauzmer, (Argued), Jose R. Arteaga, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, Attorneys for Appellant.</

562 F.3d 1344 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toros SEHER, a.k.a. Torrez, Chaplin's, Inc., Chaplin's Midtown, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chaplin's, Inc., Chaplin's Midtown, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toros Seher, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 07-13935, 07-14055 and 07-15919.

MARTIN, Circuit Judge: Chester Ray Slaughter appeals his convictions for use of the internet to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), and commission of a felony involving a minor while being required to register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2260A. On appeal, Mr. Slaughter argues that the District Court erred in fail

554 F.3d 529 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey K. SKILLING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-20885. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 6, 2009. *534 Joseph Douglas Wilson (argued), San Francisco, CA, for U.S. Daniel M. Petrocelli (argued), Mark Randall Oppenheimer, Matthew T. Kl

500 F.Supp.2d 661 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Sonia Elisa Felix FERNANDEZ, Defendant. No. EP-04-CR-2653(3)-PRM. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. July 6, 2006. *662 *663 Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, Stephen Gregory Garcia, Assis

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Jesus Roberto Gama-Bastidas (“Gama-Bastidas”) appeals from a conviction and sentence that he contends was imposed in violation of the law. He argues that the underlying indictment to which he pleaded guilty failed properly to charge him with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and, therefore, that the district court erred in sentencing him on that

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE United States of America v. Criminal No. 18-cr-118-LM Opinion No. 2019 DNH 109 John Hernandez O R D E R On March 26, 2018, a New Hampshire State Police Trooper pulled over John Hernandez after observing him commit a minor traffic violation while driving on Interstate 95. During the t

FAY, Circuit Judge: Thirteen defendants appeal their convictions of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, 21 U.S.C. Section 955c, and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, 21 U.S.C. Section 955a(a). The appellants present many issues on appeal relating to jurisdiction, admission of a foreign document, cautionary instructions on a prior conviction, the sufficiency of the evidence, jury instruc

700 F.2d 1358 12 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1256 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Marino Sanchez MARTINEZ, Dario Cordova Vargas-Blandon,Eldidio Bezerra- Anicatide, Julio Velez-Miranda, DisildoGallardo Smith, Ausberto Ricar-Sanchez, AdalbertoPedrosa-Caicedo, Sabino Iris Gutierrez, RafaelBallesteros-Velazquez, Manuel Mesino Pajaro, Rafeal C.Correa, Victor C. Fuentes, Defendants-Appellant

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge: The appellants-defendants appeal their convictions under an indictment, which in one count charged a conspiracy to violate the federal narcotics statutes on the part of all the persons named in the indictment and charged the commission of certain overt acts in pursuance of the conspiracy by some of the persons named in the indictment.

910 F.2d 567 Oscar Alberto Canas CUADRAS, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 88-7478. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1989.Decided Aug. 3, 1990. Kathleen A. McKinley, Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, San Franc