Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Gallegos-Reyes”
United States v. Julian Galindo-Gallegos, AKA Jose Reyes-Olague, AKA Aurelio Garcia-Chairez, AKA Jose Olague Reyespublic domain
244 F.3d 728 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.JULIAN GALINDO-GALLEGOS, aka Jose Reyes-Olague, aka Aurelio Garcia-Chairez, aka Jose Olague Reyes, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-50585 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted July 12, 2000Filed March 27, 2001 NOTE: SE
United States v. Julian Galindo-Gallegos, AKA Jose Reyes-Olague, AKA Aurelio Garcia-Chairez, AKA Jose Olague Reyespublic domain
ORDER The slip opinion filed March 27, 2001 and amended April 25, 2001, is amended as follows: At slip opinion 5225, lines 4-6 of the text, delete the sentence, “Whether a person is ‘in custody’ for purposes of Miranda is essentially a question of fact reviewed for clear error.” Replace with: Whether a person is “in custody” for pur
King v. United Statespublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Bishop v. United Statespublic domain
*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;
Bishop v. United Statespublic domain
*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;
Alvarado-Jimenez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Beltran-Viscarra v. United Statespublic domain
C. A: 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Chacon-Avitia v. United Statespublic domain
544 U.S. 996 CHACON-AVITIAv.UNITED STATESCONEJO-CANOv.UNITED STATESGALLEGOS-LUERA, AKA TORRES-MONSISVAISv.UNITED STATESGONZALEZ-BARRAZAv.UNITED STATESGONZALEZ-CALDERONv.UNITED STATESGRANADOS-VASQUEZv.UNITED STATESMARTINEZ-MORALES, AKA MALDONADO, AKA MARTINEZv.UNITED STATESMUNOZ-MARQUEZv.UNITED STATESONTIVEROS, AKA SAUCEDO-ONTIVEROSv.UNITED STATES
Acosta-Flores v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 591); (95 Fed. Appx. 572); (95 Fed. Appx. 677); (95 Fed. Appx. 686); (95 Fed. Appx. 694); (95 Fed. Appx. 576); (95 Fed. Appx. 691); (95 Fed. Appx. 668); (95 Fed. Appx. 693); (95 Fed. Appx. 567); (95 Fed. Appx. 672); (95 Fed. Appx. 616);
Pena-Reyes v. United Statespublic domain
*982(Reported below: 87 Fed. Appx. 930); (85 Fed. Appx. 363); (83 Fed. Appx. 620); (85 Fed. Appx. 367); (82 Fed. Appx. 901); (83 Fed. Appx. 622); (82 Fed. Appx. 902); (83 Fed. Appx. 623); (82 Fed. Appx. 908); (82 Fed. Appx. 904); (83 F
Pena-Reyes v. United Statespublic domain
*982(Reported below: 87 Fed. Appx. 930); (85 Fed. Appx. 363); (83 Fed. Appx. 620); (85 Fed. Appx. 367); (82 Fed. Appx. 901); (83 Fed. Appx. 622); (82 Fed. Appx. 902); (83 Fed. Appx. 623); (82 Fed. Appx. 908); (82 Fed. Appx. 904); (83 F
United States v. Flamingpublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-5064 Document: 67-1 Date Filed: 04/08/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 8, 2025
United States v. Marquez-Gallegospublic domain
*1269 ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge. Hector Marquez-Gallegos (“Marquez”) appeals from a sentence imposed by the district court after he pled guilty to a charge of unlawful reentry. His sentence for that offense was enhanced because he previously had been deported after an aggravated felony conviction. We have
United States v. Ramonpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 1, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH
United States v. Hernandez-Calvillopublic domain
Appellate Case: 19-3210 Document: 010110710106 Date Filed: 07/13/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 13, 2022
United States v. Youngpublic domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Suppress the Fruits of Illegal Arrest and Supporting Brief, filed May 10, 2018 (Doc. 43)("Motion"). The primary issues are: (i) whether Albuquerque Police Department ("APD") Officer Jason Harvey detained Defendant Apache Young when he took Young's pocketknife and told Young to wait with another police offi
United States v. Cruzpublic domain
OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants Jovanni Verestin-Cruz (“Verestin”), Rocky Martinez-Negron (“Martinez”), Edgar Collazo-Rivera (“Col-lazo”), and Carlos Raymundi-Hernandez’s (“Raymundi”) filed motions for acquittal under Rule 29 and/or for a new trial under Rule 33.1 See Docket Nos. 1599, 1594, 1593, and 1600. The United Stat
Wade v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On August 19, 1999, after a jury trial before Judge Lourdes G. Baird, Yvette Wade was convicted of: (1) one count of conspiring to commit a Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951; (2) four counts of committing a Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of Section 1951; and (3) four counts
United States v. Reyespublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In the middle of the night, on an empty street, Defendant Jesus Reyes failed to activate his turn signal more than 100 feet *1212before turning. Reyes was pulled over, and what began as an innocuous traffic violation ended in an arrest for federal drug and gun charges. Troubled
Vargas Ramirez v. United Statespublic domain
*1213ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on Defendant United States of America’s (“United States”) motion for summary-judgment (Def. Mot. (Dkt. # 34) (sealed), (Dkt. # 37 (redacted)) and Plaintiff Gustavo Vargas Ramirez’s (“Mr. Vargas”)