⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Galit”

District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-12-27 · Published · cited 21× · 914 F. Supp. 2d 362; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182347; 2012 WL 6720701
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, District Judge. Plaintiff pro se brings this action for monetary and equitable relief against three affiliated real estate entities, United Homes, LLC (“United Homes”), United Property Group, LLC, and Galit Network, LLC; the principal and officer of those entities, Yaron Herscho; First United Mortgage Banking Corporation (“First United”), a mortga
District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-01-27 · Published · cited 17× · 848 F. Supp. 2d 248; 2012 WL 259410
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge. Plaintiffs Sandra Barkley, Mary Lodge, Dewitt Mathis, Sylvia Gibbons, Sylvia Gibbons as the Administrator of the Estate of Rodney Gibbons, Lisa McDale, Miles McDale, and Charlene Washington (collectively “plaintiffs”) commenced this action against United Homes, LLC; United Property Group, LLC; Galit Network, LLC (the “UH Defendants”); Yaron Hershc
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-05-05 · Published · cited 11× · 787 F. Supp. 2d 247; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48314; 2011 WL 1740717
787 F.Supp.2d 247 (2011) Mary LODGE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED HOMES, LLC, United Property Group, LLC, Yaron Hershco, Galit Network, LLC, Olympia Mortgage Corp., Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Bayview Asset Management, LLC, U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee for Bayview Asset-Backed Securities Trust Series 2007-30, Bayview Financial, L.P., and Bayview Financial Management Corp., Defendants. No. 05-cv-187 (KAM)(RLM).
District Court, E.D. New York · 2009-04-20 · Published · cited 23× · 607 F. Supp. 2d 411; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33355; 2009 WL 1039880
607 F.Supp.2d 411 (2009) Dewitt MATHIS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED HOMES, LLC, United Property Group, LLC, Yaron Hershco, Galit Network, LLC, Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp., Joseph D. Gaeta, Marios Sfantos, U.S. Bank, N.A., and XYZ Corporation, Defendants. Miles McDale & Lisa McDale, Plaintiff, v. United Homes, LLC, et al., Defendants. Charlene Washington, Plaintiff, v. United Homes, LLC, et al., Defendants. <
Parizat v. Meronpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 04776
Parizat v Meron (2024 NY Slip Op 04776) Parizat v Meron 2024 NY Slip Op 04776 Decided on October 2, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-11-29 · Published · cited 8× · 2017 NY Slip Op 8355; 155 A.D.3d 1007; 66 N.Y.S.3d 37
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants Naidich Wurman Birnbaum & Maday, LLP, and Robert P. Johnson appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), entered August 20, 2015, as denied that branch of their motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the cause of action alleging legal m
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-06-02 · Published · cited 4× · 680 F. App'x 511
ORDER CERTIFYING A QUESTION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ■ CALIFORNIA Because the question of whether the.de minimis doctrine applies to Appellant’s claims “could determine the outcome” of the pending appeal in accordance with Rule 8.548(a)(1) of the California Rules of Court, and any further proceedings were we to reverse and remand the grant of summary judgment here, we respectfully request that the California Supreme Court exer
State v. Hammondpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 Ohio 8574; 99 N.E.3d 1262
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.: {¶ 1} Appellant Ramal Hammond appeals his conviction for murder, two counts of felonious assault, and having a weapon while under disability, and the trial court's determination that he was competent to stand trial. Upon review, we affirm. {¶ 2} Appellant was indicted on multiple counts relating to the alleged murder of Jamal Rolling ("the v
State v. Stutzmanpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-03-29 · Published · cited 3× · 2021 Ohio 995
[Cite as State v. Stutzman, 2021-Ohio-995.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 19AP0050 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE RODNEY R. STU
State v. Stutzmanpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-05-06 · Published · cited 3× · 2019 Ohio 1695
[Cite as State v. Stutzman, 2019-Ohio-1695.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 18AP0038 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE RODNEY R. STUTZMAN
People v. Emanuelpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2025-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LOUIS SANCHEZ EMANUEL, Defendant and Appellant. S280551 Sixth Appellate District H049147 Santa Clara County Superior Court C1246799 June 2, 2025 Justice Evans
District Court, C.D. California · 2019-04-17 · Published · cited 0× · 387 F. Supp. 3d 1019
CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Douglas Troester brings this putative wage-and-hour class action against Defendant Starbucks Corporation ("Starbucks"), alleging claims for (1) failure to pay minimum and overtime wages, (2) failure to provide accurate written wage statements, (3) failure to timely pay all final wages, and (4) unfair competition. (Dkt. 1-1 [Com
People v. Midellpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2025-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 8/28/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A168758 v. ROBERT ALLEN MIDELL, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 20NF012926A) Defendant and Appellant.
People v. Florespublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2024-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARLON FLORES, Defendant and Appellant. S267522 Second Appellate District, Division Eight B305359 Los Angeles County Superior Court BA477784 May 2, 2024
District Court, C.D. California · 2017-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 322 F. Supp. 3d 988
STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE *998I. Introduction This case was filed in early 2016 and has now reached summary judgment. The individual Plaintiffs are scheduled for trials that span from November 2017 and into December 2017. DirecTV has claimed for years that the Installers it hires through Contractin
People v. Cardenaspublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2025-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. REFUGIO RUBEN CARDENAS, Defendant and Appellant. S151493 Tulare County Superior Court VCF117251 September 4, 2025 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justices Cor
State v. Harrispublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-10-23 · Published · cited 3× · 2017 Ohio 8263
[Cite as State v. Harris, 2017-Ohio-8263.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 16CA0054-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE MATTHEW J. HARRIS
Cain v. Super. Ct.public domain
California Court of Appeal · 2025-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 4/11/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR FRED MARION CAIN III, Petitioner, A170052 v. SUPERIOR COURT OF (Solano County Super. Ct. CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF No. F23-01357) SOLANO, Respondent; THE PEOPLE
People v. Jimenezpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2025-07-03 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/3/25; modified and certified for partial publication 7/3/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, H049356 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 216443) v. MARCOS ANTO
People v. Frazierpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2024-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT WARD FRAZIER, Defendant and Appellant. S148863 Contra Costa County Superior Court 5-041700-6 August 5, 2024 Chief Justice Guerrero authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices