Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Gaddie”
United States v. Gaddiepublic domain
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Derrick Lee Gad-die (Gaddie) appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after he pled guilty to two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Gad-die argues that the district court erred when it determined that his prior convictions supported a sentence enhancement as a career offender under § 4B1.1
Gaddie v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Gaddie v. United Statespublic domain
537 U.S. 1239 GADDIEv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-8679. Supreme Court of United States. March 3, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. 2 C. A. 6
Gaddie v. Cottonpublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Gaddie v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2024 ND 170 David Walter Gaddie, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20240052 Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay D. Knudson, Judge. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Opinion of
State v. Gaddiepublic domain
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 3, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUP
State v. Gaddiepublic domain
FILED Corrected Opinion Filed 03/07/22 by Clerk of the Supreme Court IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 3, 2022
543 U.S. 947 GADDIEv.COTTON, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. No. 04-6019. Supreme Court of United States. October 18, 2004. 1 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Gaddie v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2024 ND 170 David Walter Gaddie, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20240052 Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay D. Knudson, Judge. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Opinion of
Gaddie v. K.S.D.public domain
Louser, District Court Judge. [¶ 1] R.W.D. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to his two children, K.S.D. and J.S.D. We conclude clear and convincing evidence establishes that the children, are deprived, the deprivation is likely to continue, and the children have been in foster care at least 450 of the previous 660 nights. We also conclude active efforts
Gaddy v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
United States v. Littlepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DETENTION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge ■ Defendant Gaddy Little faces drug and gun charges in this Court. See Indictment [Dkt. 1]. He was arrested on Wednesday, January 11, 2017, and appeared for his initial hearing before Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson on Thursday, January 12, 2017. At th
United States v. Carol Ryserpublic domain
MELLOY, Circuit Judge. *1020 After violating conditions of her probation by participating in an illegal "lottery" scam, Defendant-Appellant Carol Ann Ryser appeals the sentence she received for her probation violations, arguing that the district court
United States v. Spauldingpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH September 1, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court
Keion Gaddie v. State of Indianapublic domain
On Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A02-1212-CR-953 Dickson, Chief Justice. Following a bench trial, Keion Gaddie was convicted of Resisting Law Enforcement as a Class A misdemeanor. His appeal argues that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. The Court
United States v. Lozadopublic domain
MATHESON, Circuit Judge. At his jury trial for being a felon in possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), Gregory Lozado asked the district court to admit a hearsay statement from his brother-in-law, Novelle Far-ris, claiming ownership of the ammunition. The court excluded the statement because it did not meet the hearsay exception requirements of Federal
United States v. Margheimpublic domain
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. At the conclusion of a bench trial, Terry Lee Margheim was convicted of five counts of an indictment, charging him with various drug- and firearm-related offenses. He was sentenced to a term of 132 months’ imprisonment. Mr. Margheim now challenges the validity of his conviction, claiming (1) that the district court failed to comply with the requirements of
United States v. Blackpublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 16901 to 16991, sets out a “comprehensive national system for the registration of’ “sex offender[s].” Id. § 16901. Notably, however, SORNA excludes from the definition of “sex offender” a subclass of individuals
Keion Gaddie v. State of Indianapublic domain
OPINION ROBB, Chief Judge. Case Summary and Issue Keion Gaddie appeals his conviction, following a bench trial, of resisting law enforcement, a Class A misdemeanor. Gaddie raises the following issue for our review: whether the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction because he was free to disregard law en
United States v. Bramepublic domain
ORDER The court was recently informed that the appellant in this matter, Paul Eugene Brame, passed away on June 8, 2014. See Notice of Appellant’s Death, No. 13-1375 (10th Cir., filed June 10, 2014). Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal as moot, see, e.g., United States v. Judd, 42 Fed.Appx. 140, 141 n. 1 (10th Cir.2002) (noting that a party’s appeal was “rendered moot by his death”), and REMAND the case to the distri