Cases

576 F.3d 459 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Monte S. GEARHART, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-1558. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 13, 2009. Decided August 6, 2009. *461 Amanda A. Robertson (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Benton, IL, for Plainti

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-1558 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. M ONTE S. G EARHART, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. No. 06-CR-40004-JPG—J. Phil Gilbert, J

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

[Cite as State v. Gearhart, 2018-Ohio-4180.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2017-12-168 : OPINION - vs -

PER CURIAM. Appeal (7 F.Supp. 712) dismissed on motion of appellant.

NUMBER 13-17-00527-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JOHN WARDELL AND LOIS WARDELL, Appellants, v. HENRY GEARHART, JYLAINE GEARHART, AND ORION GEARHART, Appellees. On appeal from

7 F.Supp. 712 (1934) UNITED STATES v. GEARHART. No. 10309. District Court, D. Colorado. August 8, 1934. Thomas J. Morrissey, U. S. Atty., of Denver, Colo., and Byron G. Rogers, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Las Animas, Colo. Scott W. Heckman, of Grand Junction, Colo., and R. H. Walker, of Denver, Colo., for Ballard Gearhart. SYMES, District Judge. This

216 October 2, 2014 No. 63 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Frank GEARHART; Patricia Morgan; Kafoury Brothers, Inc., Petitioners on Review, and UTILITY REFORM PROJECT, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON and Portlan

94 B.R. 392 (1989) In re Joyce Anna GEARHART, Debtor. Joyce Anna GEARHART, Plaintiff, v. CLEARFIELD BANK & TRUST CO., and Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 88-987, Adv. No. 88-416. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. January 4, 1989. James B. Ball, Keystone Legal Services, Inc., State College, Pa., for

MEMORANDUM WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge. This suit was instituted under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1) for the recovery of an excise tax which was allegedly collected erroneously from plaintiff. Although the amount in controversy in this case is only $231.30, plus interest, there are a number of similarly situated taxpayers whose rights will be determined by the outcome of this test case. The essential facts, m

*218 BALMER, C. J. At issue in this case is an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) that addressed Portland General Electric’s (PGE) recovery of its capital investment in the Trojan nuclear generating facility after that facility was retired from service. In that order, the PUC made three key deci

PER CURIAM: Prison mailroom employees confiscated copies of several automotive magazines that inmate Shawn Stauffer (“Stauffer”) ordered while he was participating in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s (“TDCJ”) Sex Offender Treatment Program (“SOTP” or “Program”). Stauffer filed a § 1983 action alleging that these confiscations violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment

By Judge Clifford R. Weckstein This declaratory judgment suit arises from the injury claim of David Kyle Umberger, HI, who was a pedestrian on a sidewalk near a Roanoke hospital when he was struck and injured by an airborne four-by-eight foot sheet of plywood. Wind or other natural forces lifted the unsecured sheet of plywood from the cargo area of a pickup truck, propelling it into Umberger. The pickup truck’s driver and hi

SOBELOFF, Chief Judge: John Allen Gearhart was convicted by a jury on two counts of interstate transportation of fraudulent money orders and one count of interstate transportation of forgery tools. 1 21 He claims in this appeal that the search of his automobile and its cont

PER CURIAM: The judgment of conviction is reversed. We are of the opinion that Chernekoff v. United States, 219 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1955) governs and that United States v. Lewis, 448 F.2d 1228 (9th Cir. 1971) is distinguishable from Chernekoff. Cf. Parrott v. United States, 370 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied Lawrence v. Uni

WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge. This is a criminal case, in which the issue is whether the District Court abused its discretion in not allowing appellant to withdraw his plea of guilty prior to the imposition of sentence. On August 12, 1958, appellant was arrested and charged with forgery and the interstate trans

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Mercer Mall, Bluefield, West Virginia, FILED Plaintiff Below, Petitioner March 11, 2019 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs) No. 18-0213 ( Mercer County 17-C-146) SUPREME C

705 F.2d 293 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Gary D. APKER, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Calvin DAVENPORT, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Raymond GEARHART a/k/a "Buzzard," Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Janice FITZGERALD, Appellant. Nos. 82-1168, 82-1169, 82-1201 and 82-1242. United States Court of Ap

420 F.2d 476 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Mary Ellen PUCKETT, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.John Allen GEARHART, Appellant. No. 13686. No. 13703. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued January 6, 1970. Decided January 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM. Larry C. Glouser and Raymond P. Gearhart, Jr., appellants, were tried to a jury in January of 1959 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa and convicted on each count of a three-count indictment. Both defendants were sentenced to a term of five years’ imprisonment on each count, all terms or