Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “United States v. Fujinaga”
United States v. Craig Ivesterpublic domain
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge. Ivester appeals from his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), and aiding and abetting another’s possession of ten pounds of the drug for distribution in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to twenty-five years
United States v. Marifarms, Inc.public domain
345 F.Supp. 858 (1972) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MARIFARMS, INC. and Mitsutake Miyamura, Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MARIFARMS, INC. and Motosaku Fujinaga, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 4305, 4306. United States District Court, D. Delaware. July 13, 1972. *859 F. L. Peter Stone, U. S.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY JON J. CHINEN, Bankruptcy Judge. This Order deals with the Motion for Order Compelling Discovery filed on February 22, 1983 by Z-R Corporation, Dora Kong, Stanley Shin, Trustee and CJMD Realty, Inc., hereafter “Plaintiffs”, against James Allyn, hereafter “Allyn”, Edwin Fu-jinaga, hereafter “Fujinaga”, John Critcher, hereafter “Critcher”, and Ralph Corn-uelle, hereaf
Mulvihill v. Spinnatopublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Takiguchi v. MRI International, Inc.public domain
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS HOWARD McKIBBEN, District Judge. Before the court are the defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ third amended complaint (hereinafter referred to as “the complaint” and cited to as “TAC”) (# 161, *1108# 170 & # 171). Plaintiffs have opposed (# 169, 170, 171), and defendants have replied (# 174,179,180).
Barry Searcy v. State Bd of Correctionspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 41216 BARRY SEARCY, ) ) 2015 Opinion No. 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) Filed: January 14, 2015 v. ) ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk IDAHO STATE BOARD OF
Auto Ind. Pension Trust Fund v. Toshiba Corp.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARK STOYAS, individually No. 16-56058 and on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff, 2:15-cv-04194-DDP-JC and OPINION AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES PENSION TRUST FUND; NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
City Bank v. Saje Ventures IIpublic domain
748 P.2d 812 (1988) CITY BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SAJE VENTURES II, Edwin Y. Fujinaga, Andrea Fujinaga, Saul Tanzman, Joy Tanzman, ASF, Inc., a Hawaii corporation, SJT, Incorporated, a Hawaii corporation, CHO Enterprises, Limited, a Hawaii corporation, Domain Corporation, a Hawaii corporation, and Inter-Time Joint Venture, a Hawaii general partnership, Defendants-Appellants, and William K.M. CHEE, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Waikiki Hobron
Waikiki Hobron Associates v. Investment Mortgage, Inc. (In re Waikiki Hobron Associates)public domain
ORDER RE: MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT JON J. CHINEN, Bankruptcy Judge. On June 25, 1981, Investment Mortgage Incorporated, hereafter “IMI”, filed a Motion to Amend Judgment, wherein it sought to amend the judgment filed herein on June 19, 1981 by deleting paragraphs (2) and (4) therefrom, and adding a provision that Plaintiff be ordered to pay to IMI attorney’s fees and costs as may subsequently be determine