Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Javier Flores-Jimenez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Flores-Jimenez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and t

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Armando Jimenez-Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Jimenez-Flores has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withd

BYE, Circuit Judge. In the wake of a ten day trial, Guadalupe Jimenez-Villasenor a/k/a “Greñas” and Alejandro Flores-Romero a/k/a “Alex” were both convicted of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Jimenez-Villasenor appeals his conviction only, specifically challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Flores-Romero appeals both his conv

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) November 6, 2007 order denying petitioners’ “motion for administrative closure.” In that motion, petitioners had requested closure of proceedings based on the possibility that they might become eligible for amnesty or other relief should Congress pass new immigration legislation. We have reviewed th

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) November 6, 2007 order denying petitioners’ “motion for administrative closure.” In that motion, petitioners had requested closure of proceedings based on the possibility that they might become eligible for amnesty or other relief should Congress pass new immigration legislation. We have reviewed th

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Supreme Court of Texas. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jaime Jimenez-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007)

*1116542 U. S. 939; 542 U. S. 911; 542 U. S. 912; 542 U. S. 912; 542 U. S. 926; 542 U. S. 927; 542 U. S. 915; 542 U. S. 927; 542 U. S. 927; 542 U. S. 931; and *1117

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1180C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 100 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 247; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 436; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 805; *1181No. 04-7844. No

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

(Reported below: 76 Fed. Appx. 562); (75 Fed. Appx. 940); (78 Fed. Appx. 397); (78 Fed. Appx. 436); (79 Fed. Appx. 627); (79 Fed. Appx. 631); (79 Fed. Appx. 616); (79 Fed. Appx. 621); (79 Fed. Appx. 622); (79 Fed. Appx. 623); (79 Fed. Appx. 624). C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari

(Reported below: 76 Fed. Appx. 562); (75 Fed. Appx. 940); (78 Fed. Appx. 397); (78 Fed. Appx. 436); (79 Fed. Appx. 627); (79 Fed. Appx. 631); (79 Fed. Appx. 616); (79 Fed. Appx. 621); (79 Fed. Appx. 622); (79 Fed. Appx. 623); (79 Fed. Appx. 624). C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(Reported below: 105 Fed. Appx. 636); (105 Fed. Appx. 622); (105 Fed. Appx. 634); (105 Fed. Appx. 629); (106 Fed. Appx. 922); (105 Fed. Appx. 633); (105 Fed. Appx. 636); (108 Fed. Appx. 877); (105 Fed. Appx. 628); (105 Fed. Appx. 630); (105 Fed. Appx. 639); (104 Fed. Appx

275 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.JALIL GAZIR SUED-JIMENEZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.ELGA MARI CASTRO-RAMOS, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.ELLIOT VICENTE CASTRO-TIRADO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.JOSE LUIS ROMERO-BURGOS, Defendant, Appellant.

*974(Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 564); (101 Fed. Appx. 458); (101 Fed. Appx. 563); (101 Fed. Appx. 492); (101 Fed. Appx. 560); (101 Fed. Appx. 464); (101 Fed. Appx. 559); (101 Fed. Appx. 483); (101 Fed. Appx. 509); (101 Fed. Appx. 481);