Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JORGE FELIX IBARRA-PEREZ, No. 24-631 also known as Jorge Ibarra-Perez, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01100- Plaintiff - Appellant, DWL-CDB v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from th

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence, filed March 21, 2016 (Doc. 26)(“Motion”). The Court held an eviden-*1140tiary hearing on May 25, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether New Mexico State Police Officer Joshua Campos u

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 12-CM-1509 JEAN-BAPTISTE BADO, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPEL

Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. We decide whether the Florida felony offense of battery by “[a]ctually and intentionally touch[ing]” another person, Fla. Stat. § 784.03(l)(a), (2) (2003), “has as an element the use . . . of physical force against the person of another,” 18 U. S. C. §924(e)(2)(B)(i), and-thus constitutes a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, § 924(e)(1).

606 F.3d 144 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William S. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-4114. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: January 27, 2010. Decided: June 1, 2010. *145 ARGUED: Eric Hans Kirchman, Kirchman & Kirchman, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Richa

OPINION OF THE COURT [559 U.S. 135] Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. We decide whether the Florida felony offense of battery by “[a] dually and intentionally touch [ing]” another person, Fla. Stat. § 784.03(1)(a), (2) (2003), “has as an element the use . . . of physical force against the person of another,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i), and thus constitutes a

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Barahona-Diaz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Bara-hona-Diaz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

715 F.Supp.2d 916 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Charles Dean ANAYA, Defendant. No. CR. 09-50055-01-KES. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Western Division. May 27, 2010. *921 Carolyn G. Olson, U.S. Attorney's Office, Rapid City, SD, for Plaintiff. George E. Grassby, Federal Public Defender's O

729 F.Supp.2d 1078 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Alan SEPULVEDA-SANDOVAL and Ivan Berrellaza-Verduzco, Defendants. No. CR. 10-50045-JLV. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Western Division. July 26, 2010. *1083 Mark Alexander Vargo, U.S. Attorney's Office Rapid City Office, Rapid City, SD, for Plainti

596 F.Supp.2d 1273 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Fidel DIAZ-QUINTANA, Defendant. Case No. 1:08-cr-064. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division. February 6, 2009. *1275 David D. Hagler, U.S. Attorney's Office, Bismarck, ND, for Plaintiff. William Delaney Schmidt, Federal Public

ORDER Manuel Luque-Barahona pleaded guilty to being in the United States without permission after he was deported. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). The district court concluded that he had a prior conviction for a felony crime of violence and added 16 levels to his offense level, see U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), and sentenced him to 57 months’ imprisonment. Luque-Baraho-na challenges the 16-level increase, claiming that the d

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Salvador Flores appeals from his conviction for possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § § 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1). We affirm. I. On January 9, 2005, Nebraska Deputy Sheriff Bill Maddux was on routine patrol, traveling east on Interstate 80 in Seward County,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1938 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

652 F.3d 488 (2011) Jesus Alberto FLORES-NOVA; Araceli Castaño-Garduno, a/k/a Ariceli Flores, Jesus Alberto Flores-Nova; Araceli Castaño-Garduno, Petitioners v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES. No. 10-2044. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 18, 2011. Opinion Filed: July 25, 2011.

223 F.Supp.2d 1049 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jose RAMIREZ-CUBILLAS, Defendant. No. 4:02CR3058. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. August 21, 2002. *1050 *1051 *1052 Carlos A. Monzon, Federal public Defenders Office, Lincoln, NE,

BERZON, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents a set of thorny procedural and substantive questions implicating several areas of constitutional and immigration law. These questions include: the scope of some of the jurisdiction-stripping provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA)1; the bounda

373 F.3d 952 KWAI FUN WONG; Wu-Wei Tien Tao Association, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.UNITED STATES of America, Immigration and Naturalization Service, being sued as David V. Beebe, Jerry F. Garcia, Jack O'Brien, Douglas Glover and John Doe INS Officials; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants. No. 02-35727. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued an

NUMBER 13-23-00119-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG VICTOR MANUEL GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 464TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COU

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge James P. Donohue (R & R (Dkt. # 15)), and Respondents' and Petitioner's objections thereto (Resp't Obj. (Dkt. # 20); Pet'r Obj. (Dkt. # 21)). Having carefully reviewed the foregoing, along with all other relevant documents and the governing law, the cou

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0102p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SELENA JEAN COOPER BUTT, ex rel Q.T.R., ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │