Cases

20-1776-cr United States v. Fleming In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term, 2020 No. 20-1776-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. WARREN

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Latrenda Dinote Fleming appeals the district court’s order denying her self-styled Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Fleming, No. 1:10-cr-

ORDER Stephen Fleming used an online file-sharing program to distribute 47 files containing child pornography to an undercover FBI agent. Fleming’s stash included an image of a female toddler performing oral sex on an adult male and a video of a prepubescent female bound at the hands and legs performing sex acts. Fleming, who is 36, pleaded guilty to distributing child pornography. See 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a). The district court

PER CURIAM: Tico Lombard Fleming seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certifícate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When

676 F.3d 621 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimani Lanier FLEMING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-1404. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 26, 2011. Decided April 17, 2012. *623 David E. Hollar (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond,

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER GARY L. SHARPE, Chief Judge. I. Introduction On November 3, 2011, defendant Ahmad Fleming filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 seeking a reduction in his sentence following the retroactive application of the Fair Sentencing Act of 20101 (“FSA”), which, among other things, directed the United States Sentencing C

667 F.3d 1098 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Wayne FLEMING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-8012. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 14, 2011. *1100 Megan L. Hayes, Corthell and King, P.C., Laramie, WY, appearing for Appellant. Eric J. Heimann, Special Assistant United Stat

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Derek Marquis Fleming appeals the district court’s order denying Fleming’s motion to reconsider the order denying Fleming’s motion to correct a clerical error in its judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accor

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Phillip Fleming appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Warren Fleming appeals from a judgment of the District Court, revoking Fleming’s supervised release and sentencing him to forty-eight months’ imprisonment on the ground that he violated his conditions of release by committing additional state crimes. Fleming contends that it was plain error for the *88District Court to find, by a preponderance o

554 F.Supp.2d 1286 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Marvin FLEMING, Defendant. Case No. 5:02cr38-RH/AK. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division. April 26, 2008. *1287 Bruce E. Lowe, Esq., U.S. Attorneys, Tallahassee, FL, for United States of America. ORDER DENYING § 2255 MOTION</

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, v. Case No. 23-cr-370 (JMC) JAMAL FLEMING, Defendant. ORDER Jamal Fleming moves for a modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), arguing that because of a 2023 amendment to the sentencing guidelines the Court should reduce his t

ORDER Kimani Fleming was convicted of distributing and possessing with intent to dis*947tribute crack, unlawfully transporting firearms, possessing a firearm in connection with his drug offenses, and possessing a firearm even though he was a felon, all during August 2007. At trial, five witnesses testified that Fleming sold crack throughout 2006 and 2007. Fleming appeals, argui

MEMORANDUM ** Craig Richard Fleming appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Appellant contends that the district court erred by improperly considering uncharged conduct and dismissed allegations in imposing a sentence at the high end of the undisputed Sentencing Guidelines p

MEMORANDUM ** Edward Fleming was convicted of attempting to smuggle four undocumented aliens to Guam in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(i). While the evidence that he was smuggling aliens is overwhelming, Fleming argues the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of specific intent to smuggle to a non-designated port. The statute makes it a crime to attempt to assist an alien to enter the Unite

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the memoranda filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the district court filed Se

PER CURIAM.* Charles Fleming appeals his guilty plea conviction for possession of cocaine base. Fleming argues that 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) was rendered facially unconstitutional by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Fleming concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our opinion in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 581-82

MEMORANDUM ** James Earl Fleming appeals the district court’s, order revoking supervised release and imposing a three-month term of imprisonment and three-year term of supervised release. He originally pleaded guilty to a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Fleming’

MEMORANDUM * Lawrence M. Fleming, a resident of Saipan, appeals from his January 6, 2003 conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine (“ice”) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). Fleming’s principal contention is that his previous acquittal on the substantive offense of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine barred the government from

MEMORANDUM ** Henry Fleming appeals his sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He argues that the sentence should be vacated and remanded to permit the district court to consider a downward departure. We conclude that Fleming waived his right to appeal and, accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Fleming’s plea agreement pro