Cases

PER CURIAM: * Naun Martinez-Figueroa pleaded guilty to being found in the United States after previous deportation and was sentenced to 37 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Martinez-Figueroa argues that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. Specifically, he argues that the viability of Almendarez-Torres v

543 U.S. 1100 MARTINEZ-FIGUEROAv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-5113. Supreme Court of United States. January 24, 2005. 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 363 F. 3d 679; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and

LOKEN, Chief Judge. After a jury convicted Luciano Martinez-Figueroa of conspiracy to distribute and possession with the intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana, the district court ** sentenced him to 97 months in prison. Martinez-Figueroa appealed his conviction, raising two eviden-tiary issues. We

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-2326 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Dist

LOKEN, Chief Judge. Missouri state highway patrol officers stopped Luciano Martinez-Figueroa driving a tractor-trailer rig on Interstate 44 near Joplin, Missouri. A consent search of the refrigerated trailer revealed a load of cheddar cheese and 537 kilograms of marijuana. Figueroa was charged with conspiracy to distribute marijuana and possession of marijuana with the intent to

SUMMARY ORDER Co-defendants-appellants Manuel Geral-do, Hargelis Vargas, and Jugo Cespedes (collectively, “defendants”) appeal from sentences and final judgments of conviction entered on October 30, 2015, November 25, 2015, and December 3, 2015, respectively, each by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history,

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ruben Sosa-Balderama (Sosa) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Sosa has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant po

PER CURIAM: . Appellants were jointly tried and convicted on an indictment charging them *591 and two others with conspiring to receive, conceal, buy, sell and facilitate the transportation and concealment of 320 pounds of marihuana in violation of 21 U

697 F.Supp.2d 244 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROSARIO-CAMACHO, Luis Rodriguez-Sostre, Josue Perez-Mercado, Ramon Maysonet-Soler, Jose Negron-Sostre, Defendants. Criminal No. 08-310 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 22, 2010. David Ramos-Pagan, Jorge L. Armenteros-Chervoni, San Juan, PR, for Defendant Jose Rodrigue

*1098C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 122; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 360 F. 3d 1339; *1099No. 03-10727. No. 03-10742. No. 03-10752. No. 03-10755. <

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly respond to our order directing them to file a status report concerning how these appeals should proceed in view of this court’s decisions in O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed. Cir.2002) and Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002). The court previously granted the motion of Fernando Blanco et

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

539 U.S. 953 Garza-Hernandezv.United States.Perez-Huertav.United StatesZapata-Martinezv.United StatesSolis-Brionesv.United StatesCarbajal-Taglev.United StatesMartinez-Rodriguezv.United StatesSalinas-Rodriguezv.United StatesCortes-Gallegosv.United StatesMendoza-Martinezv.United StatesHernandez-Hernandezv.United StatesGonzalez-Medra

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F. 3d 703 (seventh judgment) and 704 (first through sixth judgments).

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 101–142 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 23, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1414 LASHAUN CASEY, Petitioner, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge]

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit