Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Figueredo”
United States v. Alexander Ramirez-Figueredopublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0091p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-App
United States v. Figueredo-Alvarezpublic domain
943 F.2d 1318 U.S.v.Figueredo-Alvarez** NO. 90-8542 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. AUG 15, 1991 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2
United States v. Figueredopublic domain
774 F.2d 1159 *U.S.v.Figueredo 85-3132 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. 9/26/85 1 E.D.La. DISMISSED 2 ---------------
United States v. Anibal Figueredo-Diazpublic domain
OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. The government appeals an order of the district court suppressing evidence regarding defendants Aníbal Figueredo-Diaz and Dario Morales-Loya. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. Federal agents tracked Emilio Rivas from Texas to Memphis, Tennessee, suspecting he might be trafficking drugs
United States v. Figueredopublic domain
350 F.Supp. 1031 (1972) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Louis Henry FIGUEREDO, Jr., et al., Defendants. Cr. No. 72-44. United States District Court, M. D. Florida, Tampa Division. November 20, 1972. John L. Briggs, U. S. Atty., by Bernard H. Dempsey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff. Raymond E. LaPorte, Tampa, Fla., for Figueredos Jr
134 F.3d 383 98 CJ C.A.R. 179 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, o
Figueredo-Alvarez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
7 F.3d 1045 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UNI
Jeremy Lynn Figueredo v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-17-00334-CR No. 07-17-00335-CR ________________________ JEREMY LYNN FIGUEREDO, APPELLANT V.
USCA11 Case: 23-12566 Document: 52-1 Date Filed: 05/01/2024 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12566 ____________________ CARLOS ALBERTO CUENCA FIGUEREDO,
84 B.R. 856 (1988) In re Norman A. FIGUEREDO and Catalina V. Figueredo, Debtors. The INTERNATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Norman A. FIGUEREDO and Catalina V. Figueredo, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 87-02832-BKC-TCB, Adv. No. 88-0049-BKC-TCB-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. March 10, 1988. Dennis M. Campbell, Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, D
PER CURIAM: Augustin Figueredo, Richardo Torres, and Pedro Reinosa were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Finding each of their contentions raised on this appeal to be without merit, we affirm.
Figueredo v. South Florida Beverage Corp.public domain
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.
United States v. Karnail Singhpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0054p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaint
United States v. Antwone Miguel Sanderspublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0143p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaint
United States v. Dardenpublic domain
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On November 2, 2018, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Omnibus Order *706(Doc. No. 823) that resolved most of the pending motions in this case. The remaining Motions were set for oral arguments or evidentiary hearings, and they were held during the last week of November 2018.
United States v. Johnsonpublic domain
OPINION COLE, Chief Judge. The United States appeals the district court’s order suppressing a firearm found in defendant Samuel Johnson’s car during a traffic stop. The district court ruled that because the police had unconstitutionally seized Johnson before he rolled through a stop sign, this'traffic violation could not justify the stop. Considering all the facts and circumstances, we conclude
United States v. Napout Et. Anopublic domain
18-2750 (L) United States of America v. Napout et. ano UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 (Argued: November 7, 2019 Decided: June 22, 2020) Docket Nos. 18-2750 (L), 18-2820 (Con) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States v. Gonzalezpublic domain
OPINION BROTMAN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the court is an application by the Government that defendants Francisco Hernandez and Juan Herran be detained pending trial, pursuant to the Bail Reform Act of 1984. Specifically, the government asserts that a rebuttable presumption has arisen that “no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appeara
United States v. Whitepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. Defendant Eugene Jimmie White II, charged with drug distribution crimes, has filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained through the execution of search warrants for active real time cell site and GPS location data monitoring, including a search warrant for his residence based on information he believes was