Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Felix-Ramirez”
United States v. Felix-Ramirezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Felix-Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Felix-Ramirez contends that his sentence in excess of two years, based on a sentencing enhancement under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) for a prior drug trafficking conviction, is illegal and violated his Sixth Amendment rights under Apprendi v. New Je
King v. United Statespublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 30, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-01050-CV JORGE CORREA AND FELIX RAMIREZ, Appellants V. HOUSTON SURGICAL ASSISTANT SERVICES, INC, Appellee On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas
Alomia-Angulo v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: Judge Atkins and I concur in Judge Simpson’s view that the conviction of Cazares-Ramirez must be affirmed and, acting as a majority, we also affirm the conviction of .Jose Felix Nandin. ^s ju(jge Simpson has indicated, he -would reverse Nandin’s conviction for insufficiency of evidence, In Smith v. United States, 5th Cir. 1967, 385
United States v. Ramirez-Rojaspublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Othon Ramirez-Rojas appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 15-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez-Rojas’s counsel has fi
United States v. Ayala-Ramirezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felix Elíseo Ayala-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ayala-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel
United States v. Lopezpublic domain
479 F.Supp.2d 225 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Luis A. LOPEZ, Jose Escipion Fernandez-Pino, Julio Cartagena, Alexander Serna, Pablo R. Baez, Alberto M. Benval, Leslihe Abad, Ernesto Perez, Six-to Rivera, Victor Vega, Felix Ramirez Richard Duran, Alicia Milagros, Defendants. Criminal Nos. 2005-10304-GAO-01, 2005-10304-GAO-05, 2005-10304-GAO-06, 2005-10304-GAO-07, 2005-10304-GAO-08, 2005-10304-GAO-09, 2005-10304-GAO-10,
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
United States v. Ramirezpublic domain
291 B.R. 386 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Felix RAMIREZ and wife, Monica Ramirez, and Ernest Ramirez, Trustee, Defendants. No. 5:00-CV-351-C. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Lubbock Division. March 11, 2002. *387 *388 E. Scott Frost, U.S. Attorney's Office, Lubbock,
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
Berkley v. United Statespublic domain
DYK, Circuit Judge, dissenting. In endorsing a facial challenge to a memorandum, and in holding that the memorandum must be assumed to dictate racial and gender discrimination without a factual hearing, the majority acts contrary to Supreme Court precedent and our own decision in Baker v. United States, 127 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.1997). The majority’s approach is unsupported by any decision of the Supreme
United States v. Candelaspublic domain
110 F.Supp.2d 39 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Hector CANDELAS, Hector Pesquera, William Ruiz-Garcia, Felix Ramirez, Jose E. Quintero, Defendants. Nos. CRIM. 00-374(PG), 00-365(PG), 00-368(PG), 00-371(PG), 00-372(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 5, 2000. *40 Ivonne Diaz-De-Carreras, Ha
Ramirez v. United Statespublic domain
81 F.Supp.2d 532 (2000) Felix Ramon RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America; John Thompson, Deneise Dungee, Venson Davis, Sharon Dooley, James Fitzgerald, Tracey Ann Mccormick, and Frederick Smith, as agents, servants or employees of the INS individually and in their official capacities; County of Hudson; Hudson County Sheriff's Office; Joseph T. Cassidy, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of Hudson County; Hudson County Jail; an
United States v. Ramirez-Ocampopublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Felix Ramirez-Ocampo appeals his conviction following guilty plea and the 15-month sentence imposed for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez-Ocampo’s counsel has submitted a brief stating that he has found no meritorious issues for review.
Nery v. United Statespublic domain
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves for summary affirmance of the April 30, 1998 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment. Leonardo Nery et al. oppose. Nery et al. served the United States as New Philippine Scouts during and after World War II. Nery et al. filed a civil action
Ramirez v. United Statespublic domain
998 F.Supp. 425 (1998) Felix Ramon RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Immigration and Naturalization Service; Doris Meissner, individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the INS; Warren A. Lewis, individually and in his capacity as District Director of INS's Newark Field Office; John and Jane Does 1-10, fictitious names for unknown agents, servants or employees of the INS individually and in their offi
Ramirez v. Attorney General of the United Statespublic domain
*229OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Chief Judge. Felix Alfonso Vasquez Ramirez (“Vasquez”) seeks review of an IJ’s decision denying his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order affirming the IJ’s decision under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We will grant the petition for review. I.