Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Farrington”
United States v. Farringtonpublic domain
499 F.3d 854 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Byron FARRINGTON, Appellant. No. 06-3734. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 23, 2007. Filed: August 24, 2007. *855 *856 *857 John F. Fatino, argued, Des
United States v. Farringtonpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. Appellant Raphael Farrington was convicted of bank fraud and money laundering. On appeal he contends that the District Court misapplied the money-laundering statute, improperly refused to sever Farrington’s trial from that of a co-defendant, issued faulty jury instructions, and erroneously excluded evidence. He also claims ineffective assistance of counsel. We have consider
United States v. Farringtonpublic domain
ORDER Jeffrey H. Farrington pleaded guilty to four counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The district court sentenced him to four concurrent terms of 127 months’ incarceration and three years’ supervised release, and also ordered him to pay $175,075 in restitution to four victim banks., On appeal Farrington argues under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) that he should be resentenced because the district judge owned stock in one
United States v. Shaun Farringtonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2974 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Shaun Michael Farrington
Farrington v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Farrington v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Farrington v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 401 Fed. Appx. 784.
Farrington v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Byron Farringtonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-3734 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distri
Farrington v. United Statespublic domain
920 F.Supp. 12 (1996) Walter C. FARRINGTON v. UNITED STATES of America v. Scott W. BUKER. Civil No. 94-108-SD. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. January 18, 1996. *13 Nathan T. Foose, Gray, Wendell & Clark, Manchester, NH, for Walter C. Farrington. Gretchen Leah Witt, U.S. Attorney's Office, Conco
United States v. Farringtonpublic domain
*615Opinion of the Court Kilday, Judge: Appellant was tried by general court-martial, convened at Frankfurt/Main, Germany, charged with intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 928. He pleaded not guilty but was found guilty as charged. The court-martial sentenced him to a d
United States v. Farringtonpublic domain
172 F.Supp. 797 (1959) UNITED STATES of America v. Phillips FARRINGTON. Civ. A. No. 57-967. United States District Court D. Massachusetts. April 13, 1959. *798 Anthony Julian, U. S. Atty., Andrew A. Caffrey, Asst. U. S. Atty., Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. W. Langdon Powers, Boston, Mass., for defendant. ALDRICH, Di
Farrington v. Mayorkaspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SYLVIA E. FARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-3240 (BAH) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Secretary of Homeland Security, Defendant. MEMO
Farrington v. WV Invs.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA23-416 Filed 5 November 2024 Watauga County, No. 21 CVS 180 DAVID BRADFORD FARRINGTON and MARGARET ELIZABETH FARRINGTON, Plaintiffs, v. WV INVESTMENTS, LLC, Defendant. Appeal by WV Investments, LLC from judgment entered 7 October 2022 by Judge Kimberly Y. Best in Watauga County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 17 October 2023.
Jones v. Farringtonpublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis de*1145nied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until March 18, 1996, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
United States v. Farringtonpublic domain
JOHNSON, District Judge. This is a motion of the United States of America to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the petition of Virginia Farrington to return her automobile alleged to be illegally seized. The petition of Virginia Farrington alleges that, incident to the sentence of the above-named defendant on certain liquor violations, an automobile belonging to her was illegally seized and confiscated, an
Farrington v. Lincoln (In Re Farrington)public domain
118 B.R. 871 (1990) In re Al D. FARRINGTON, Debtor. Al D. FARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. Margaret A. LINCOLN, f/k/a Margaret A. Farrington, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 90-0092-8P7, Adv. No. 90-147. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. August 13, 1990. *872 Larry H. Evans, Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff.
United States v. Farringtonpublic domain
JOHNSON, District Judge. This case comes before the court on a petition for a bill of particulars. The defendants were indicted under a single count for conspiracy, based on section 37 of the Criminal Code, 18 USCA § 88. The petitioner, Prince D. Farrington, in a petition for a bill of particulars, in behalf of himself and the other defendants, prays that this court direct the United S
United States v. Farringtonpublic domain
JOHNSON, District Judge. This case comes before the court on a petition for a bill of particulars. Defendant was indicted under the Revenue Act of 1928 (26 USCA § 2001 et seq.) for having unlawfully, willfully, knowingly, and feloniously attempted to defeat and evade his income tax for the years 1929, 1930, and 1931, and for having unlawfully and willfully failed to make a return for the year 1931.
State v. Farringtonpublic domain
Office of the Director New Mexico 10:53:19 2020.12.16 Compilation '00'07- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2020-NMSC-022 Filing Date: October 19, 2020 No. S-1-SC-3