Cases

22-1247-cr United States v. Fabian UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2025 Argued: September 29, 2025 Decided: March 25, 2026 Docket No. 22-1247-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

PER CURIAM. Fabian Taylor, Jr., pleaded guilty to possessing a gun while a felon and was sentenced to 96 months’ imprisonment. This sentence reflects a 25-month upward departure from Taylor’s initial Guidelines range. The district court 2 enhanced the sentence to reflect Taylor’s understated criminal history and his rec

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alan B. Fabian seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alan B. Fabian seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice

MEMORANDUM ** Fausto Antonio Fabian appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Fabians’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provide

798 F.Supp.2d 647 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Alan Brian FABIAN. Civil No. CCB-09-2810. Crim. No. CCB-07-0355. United States District Court, D. Maryland. July 14, 2011. *654 Alan Brian Fabian, Lewisburg, PA, pro se. MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE, District Judge. On May 16, 2008, Alan B

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alan B. Fabian seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certi

PER CURIAM: Alan and Jackie Fabian appeal from the district court’s order granting the government’s motion to clarify the forfeiture order entered in Alan Fabian’s criminal case. We have reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and we find no reversible error. Additionally, we hold that the Fabians are collaterally estopped from seeking to relitigate the relevant issue in this appeal because the North Carolina Supe

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge THACKER wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge KING joined. Judge SHEDD wrote a dissenting opinion. THACKER, Circuit Judge: Appellant Fabian Montes-Flores (“Appellant”) challenges his sentence of 46 months imprisonment, imposed as a result *361of his conviction pursuant to a violation of 8 U.S.C.

555 F.3d 66 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Wayne FABIAN, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 01-1471-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: March 6, 2002. Decided: December 5, 2002. Motion Decided: February 9, 2009. *67 Wayne Fabian, pro se, Defendant-Appellant.

01-1471-cr U.S. v. Fabian 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 -------- 4 August Term, 2001 5 6 (Argued: March 6, 2002 Decided: December 5, 2002 7 Motion Decided: February 9, 2009) 8 9 Docket No. 01-1471-cr 10 ----------------------------------

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Sean Fabian appeals the district court’s judgment convicting him, pursuant to his guilty plea, of the distribution of more than five grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and of possession of a firearm by a previously convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). United States v. Sean Fabian, No. 04-CR-71-01 (D.Vt. Oct. 2, 2006). The court sentenced Fabian to a term of

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-3043 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distr

522 F.Supp.2d 1078 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rowland A. FABIAN, Defendant. Rowland A. Fabian, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Northern Indiana Public Service Company, Third-Party Defendant. No. 2:02-CV-495. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. March 29, 2007. Order Denying Reconsideration October 5, 2007.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2010 No. 09-40882 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STAT

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Fabian-Garcia appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful reentry by deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Fabian-Garcia contends that the sentence was not reasonable because the district court failed to address all relevant sentencing factor

*609MEMORANDUM ** Jose Guadalupe Fabian-Chavez appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Fabian-Chavez contends that the district court erred by granting

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Fabian Lafuente was convicted by a jury of attempting to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, possessing with intent to distribute cocaine, and possessing a firearm with an altered, removed, or obliterated serial number. He was sentenced to 300 months’ imprisonment. Lafuente appeals his conviction, arguing that his trial counsel had labored under a co

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 01-3397 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States

Opinion by Judge FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Fabian Barrios-Gutierrez was indicted for illegal entry after deportation in viola*1120tion of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He appeals his conviction and sentence. We conclude that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 by failing adequately to i