Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. FLORES”
United States v. FLORESpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before DALY, KIRKBY, and GROSS Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Steven G. FLORES Missile Technician Petty Officer First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy
United States v. Florespublic domain
Case: 23-50128 Document: 79-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED No. 23
United States v. Florespublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Israel E. FLORES, Senior Airman United States Air Force, Appellant No. 23-0198 Crim. App. No. 40294 Argued November 7, 2023—Decided March 14, 2024 Military Judge: Pilar G.
United States v. Florespublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Israel E. FLORES, Senior Airman United States Air Force, Appellant No. 23-0198 Crim. App. No. 40294 Argued November 7, 2023—Decided March 14, 2024 Military Judge: Pilar G.
United States v. Flores-Naterpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1911 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JADNEL FLORES-NATER, a/k/a Potro, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Florespublic domain
Case: 22-40448 Document: 00516542572 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 11, 2022
United States v. Flores-Gonzalezpublic domain
USCA1 Opinion Can't open 19-2204E2.01a.docx
United States v. Flores-Naterpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 21-1856 21-1979 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JADNEL FLORES-NATER, a/k/a Potro, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Ju
United States v. Flores 2public domain
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES v. Solomon R. FLORES Chief Culinary Specialist (E-7), U.S. Coast Guard CGCMG 0382 Docket No. 1474 11 August 2022 General court-martial sentence adjudg
United States v. Florespublic domain
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES v. Solomon R. FLORES Chief Culinary Specialist (E-7), U.S. Coast Guard CGCMG 0377 Docket No. 001-62-20 01 June 2020 General Court-Martial convened by Comman
United States v. Flores-Gonzalezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2204 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. EMILIANO EMMANUEL FLORES-GONZÁLEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Florespublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before STEPHENS, LAWRENCE, and COGLEY Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Brandon W. FLORES Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
United States v. Flores-Quinonespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-2029 18-2030 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RAFAEL J. FLORES-QUIÑONES, a/k/a Popeye, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A.
United States v. Florespublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. *540 This appeal implicates two issues rooted in the Fourth Amendment. See U.S. Const. amend. IV. The first involves the district court's determination that probable cause existed for the arrest of defendant-appellant Charles Flores; the second invol
United States v. Flores-Rivaspublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before STEPHENS, LAWRENCE, and GERRITY Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Yobany E. FLORES-RIVAS Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps
United States v. Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of t
United States v. Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of th
United States v. Florespublic domain
ORDER Arturo Flores was sentenced below his applicable guidelines range to 168 months’ imprisonment for conspiring to possess and distribute heroin and cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). Flores later moved under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduced sentence based on Amendment 782 to the sentencing guidelines, which retroactively lowered by two the base offense level for his crimes. The district court denied his motion after conclud
United States v. Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Timoteo Juan Flores raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, .contemporary definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include an age-
United States v. Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflec