Cases

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Defendant, Georgina Fisher, is charged with eight counts of causing, or attempting to cause, a financial institution to fail to file a report required by 31 U.S.C. § 5325(a)(2), and the regulations thereunder, in violation of

DECISION AND ORDER HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Defendant, Georgina Fisher, is charged with eight counts of structuring, in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324(a)(1). She has made a number of arguments for dismissal, based primarily on the Government’s conduct before the grand jury, as well as the Government’s efforts to forfeit her home in the event of a conviction. In a previous

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Janell Tovah Fisher seeks to appeal, for the second time, his 2013 conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. We affirmed the district court’s judgment on Fisher’s first direct appeal. United States v. Fisher, 554 Fed.Appx. 214 (4th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, we deny the motion to appoint counsel and d

DECISION AND ORDER HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This ease is before the Court on the Government’s objections to Magistrate Judge Scott’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 107, United States v. Fisher, 2016 WL 2779018 (W.D.N.Y. May 13, 2016)), which recommends dismissing the superseding indictment without prejudice. In the alternative, Judge Scott recommends striki

FILED UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT APR 2 8 2015 FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA cwm, u.s. answer & Ba,,k,,, tc Courts for the D|str|ct of Coluinbia ) ) UNITED sTATEs oF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal Case N0. 16-0060 (RCL) ) RQGER JERoME FISHER, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS IN SUPPORT OF ORDER OF DETENTION Defendant is charged by indictment with bank robbery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2ll3(a). The Court conducted a d

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Jerold D. Fisher entered a plea agreement and pled guilty to submitting fraudulent tax returns to the Internal Revenue Service. In return, the Government promised, among other things, not to charge Mr. Fisher with any further crimes arising out of the same underlying conduct. Following the plea agreement and before sentencing, the district court found Mr.

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, K.J. BRUBAKER Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH E. FISHER FIRE CONTROL TECHNICIAN SEAMAN (E-3), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 201400426 GENE

OPINION McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. The question presented on appeal is whether the evidence derived from a war-rantless GPS automobile search should be excluded or whether the good-faith exception to the warrant requirement applies. We determine that the police had an objectively reasonable good-faith belief that them conduct was lawful and was sanctioned by then binding appellate precedent, and thus, the exc

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Stacey Lane Fisher seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A ce

635 F.3d 336 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Dorsey, Sr., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 10-2352, 10-3124. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 15, 2011. Decided March 11, 2011.

PER CURIAM. On March 23, 2011, the defendants-appellants Anthony Fisher (# 10-2352) and Edward Dorsey (# 10-3124) filed petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing. On April 5, 2011, an order was issued directing the government to file an answer to the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Edward Dorsey. The answer was filed on April 19, 2011. Subsequently, a vote wa

648 F.3d 442 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-2460. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 8, 2011. Decided and Filed: July 19, 2011. *444 ARGUED: Harold Gurewitz, Gurewitz & Raben, PLC, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant. Ka

646 F.3d 429 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Dorsey, Sr., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 10-2352, 10-3124. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. May 25, 2011. Jonathan H. Koenig, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Milwau

624 F.3d 713 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darius Nathaniel FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-30424. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 26, 2010. *715 Camille Ann Domingue (argued), Brett L. Grayson, Asst. U.S. Attys., J. Collins Sims, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. D

597 F.3d 1156 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Floyd Eugene FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-6142. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. March 10, 2010. *1157 Submitted on the briefs:[*] Perry W. Hudson, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant. Robert J. Troester, Act

PER CURIAM: * Antonio D. Fisher, federal prisoner # 07949-043, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), based upon the amendments United States Sentencing Guidelines that reduced the base offense levels for offenses involving crack cocaine. See United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 236 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

669 F.Supp.2d 1013 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Micheal FISHER, Defendant. Case No. 1:08-cr-026. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division. November 17, 2009. *1014 Clare R. Hochhalter, U.S. Attorney's Office, Bismarck, ND, Christopher S. Strauss, Michael J. Watling, U.S. Department of

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY MICHAEL R. MURPHY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before the court on Stacy Fisher’s pro se request for a certificate of appealability (“COA”). Fisher seeks a COA so he can appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). Because Fisher has not “made a substantial showing

ORDER Andre Fisher entered a guilty plea to a charge of possession with the intent to distribute more than 5 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to 210 months in prison. In his appeal from the sentence, we recognized that his sentencing range would have been significantly lower were it not for the 100:1 ratio, crack to powder cocaine, as called for in the version of United States Sentencing Gui

587 F.Supp.2d 635 (2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Timothy FISHER, Defendant. No. 08 CR 937 (JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 24, 2008. Christian R. Everdell, U.S. Attorney's Office, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Francisco Celedonio, Law Office of Francisco E. Celedonio, New York, NY, Anthony J. Pope, Esq., Picillo Caruso Pope Edel