Cases

Manion, Circuit Judge. When Grover Ferguson was 17 years old he shot a woman three times during a carjacking, causing significant permanent injury. Ferguson pleaded guilty to vehicular robbery by force and discharging a gun. The sentencing guidelines range was 198 to 217 months' imprisonment (16.5 to 18 years), but the district judge sentenced Ferguson to 600 months in prison (50 years). He appealed, and in United States v. Ferg

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Defendant Grover Ferguson appeals his sentence. He was seventeen years old when he shot a woman three times during a carjacking, permanently disabling her. The high end of the guideline range for his crime was 217 months in prison. The government recommended a 240-month above-guideline sentence based on the severity of Ferguson’s violent actions. The district court, however, imposed a sentence of 600

*789 OPINION JANET T. NEFF, District Judge. A February 12, 2014 Indictment charges Defendants with (1) Conspiracy to Manufacture Marijuana, 18 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(mi); and (2) Manufacture of Marijuana, 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(mi), 18 U.S.C. § 2. The charges stem from the evidence obtained in an October 3, 2013 sear

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cathy Diane Ferguson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as a sue-*282cessive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion her motion seeking to correct and to reduce her sentence. The order is not appealable

OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Defendant Kaitlin Michelle Ferguson pled guilty to one count of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The charge was based on Ferguson’s involvement in a scheme to secure lines of credit through unauthorized use of the retail store Cold-water Creek’s banking account. At sentencing, Ferguson requested a downward “variance” from the advisory 10-to-16 month

*224Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cathy Diane Ferguson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a c

KATZMANN, Circuit Judge: This ease requires us to determine whether the “public safety” exception to the requirement of Miranda warnings — an exception that the United States Supreme Court first recognized in New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649, 655-56, 104 S.Ct. 2626, 81 L.Ed.2d 550 (1984) — applies where police officers have reason to believ

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: P.W. Ferguson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6).* The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO STRIKE THE VENIRE DUE TO AN UNDERREPRESENTATION OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. Trial commenced in this case on May 8, 2012 when 116 prospective jurors were summoned from the Qualified Jury Wheel in the Detroit division of this district. Jury selection was protracted because of pretrial publicity that has exposed exactl

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, SEVER, AND FOR PRODUCTION OF GRAND JURY AND BRADY MATERIAL DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. The defendants are charged with various offenses concerning the formation and execution of contracts for the development of a phase of a federal housing project. The grand jury has alleged that the defendants manipulated bids for the project so they could ove

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cathy Diane Ferguson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006)

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: P.W. Ferguson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certifi

676 F.3d 260 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ronald E. FERGUSON, Christopher P. Garand, Elizabeth A. Monrad, Robert D. Graham, Christian M. Milton, Defendants-Appellants.[*] Docket Nos. 08-6211-cr(L), 09-0121-cr(Con), 09-0313-cr(XAP), 09-0507-cr(Con), 09-0881-cr(XAP), 09-1072-cr(Con), 09-1120-cr(XAP), 09-1677-cr(Con), 09-1723-cr(XAP), 09-2127-cr(Con), 09-2141-cr(XAP). United St

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Shawn Christopher Ferguson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not ap-pealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (20

653 F.3d 61 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ronald E. FERGUSON, Christopher P. Garand, Elizabeth A. Monrad, Robert D. Graham, Christian M. Milton, Defendants-Appellants.[*] Docket Nos. 08-6211-cr(L), 09-0121-cr(Con), 09-0313-cr(XAP), 09-0507-cr(Con), 09-0881-cr(XAP), 09-1072-cr(Con), 09-1120-cr(XAP), 09-1677-cr(Con), 09-1723-cr(XAP), 09-2127-cr(Con), 09-2141-cr(XAP). United Sta

669 F.3d 756 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan K. FERGUSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-3070. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 17, 2011. Decided and Filed: February 27, 2012. *758 ARGUED: Timothy F. Sweeney, Law Office of Timothy Farrell Sweeney, Clevelan

DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND.................................................................69 I - All Defendants’ Claims.....................................................75 A - Stock Price Data......................................................75

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher Ferguson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2006). A

ERDMANN, Judge, with whom RYAN, Judge, joins (dissenting): As I cannot agree with the majority’s conclusion that Ferguson’s guilty plea to the offense of indecent exposure was provident, I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals and set aside the finding of guilty to Specification 1 of Charge II. T

667 F.Supp.2d 567 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Irvin Jamar FERGUSON. No. 1:08cr166-1. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. October 15, 2009. *568 Robert A.J. Lang, Winston-Salem, NC, for United States of America. John A. Dusenbury, Jr., Office of Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, NC, for Irvin Jamar